2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-97332006000600020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exchange energy in coupled quantum dots

Abstract: In this work, the exchange energy J for a system of two laterally-coupled quantum dots, each one with an electron, is calculated analytically and in a detailed form, considering them as hydrogen-like atoms, under the Heitler-London approach. The atomic orbitals, associated to each quantum dot, are obtained from translation relations, as functions of the Fock-Darwin states. Our results agree with the reported ones by Burkard, Loss and DiVincenzo in their model of quantum gates based on quantum dots, as well as … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the result of increase of the magnetic field B for a pressure P = 0. The results are in agreement with the results of Caicedo-Ortiz et al [7]. As the magnetic field changes over the quantum dot, the energy levels intersect.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is the result of increase of the magnetic field B for a pressure P = 0. The results are in agreement with the results of Caicedo-Ortiz et al [7]. As the magnetic field changes over the quantum dot, the energy levels intersect.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) are lowdimensional systems, in which charge carriers are confined to three dimensions [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], and are composed mainly of GaAs, GaAsAl, CdSe, or PbS. The quantum dot acts as a box that confines particles like electrons, holes or excitons, where the number of particles is controlled by applying a potential difference across two electrodes connected to the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lastly, we compare the CI method with Heitler London (HL) and Hund Mulliken (HM) techniques which previous studies [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] use to study DQD exchange energy. The CI outlined here is more general than these methods from a variational standpoint: The full CI is a variational method and the space of trial wavefunctions includes the HL and HM spaces as long as the number of Gaussian functions n G ≥ 2 (and is identical to HM for n G = 2).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%