2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-97332005000200009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic time-uncertainties and decoherence: comparison of 4 models

Abstract: Four models of energy decoherence are discussed from the common perspective of intrinsic timeuncertainty. The four authors -Milburn, Adler, Penrose, and myself -have four different approaches. The present work concentrates on their common divisors at the level of the proposed equations rather than at the level of the interpretations. General relationships between time-uncertainty and energy-decoherence are presented in both global and local sense. Global and local master equations are derived. (The local conce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the physical mechanisms causing decoherence are fundamentally different in the two models, the resulting predictions for the decoherence rate are basically identical [24]. We will refer to this model as the Diósi-Penrose (DP) model.…”
Section: What Are the Limits Of Quantum Theory?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the physical mechanisms causing decoherence are fundamentally different in the two models, the resulting predictions for the decoherence rate are basically identical [24]. We will refer to this model as the Diósi-Penrose (DP) model.…”
Section: What Are the Limits Of Quantum Theory?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, which is expected to be in the order 3 In all following calculations x is assumed to be 1. of 1 (Christian, 2005)) defines a measure how much the space-time geometries of the States 1 and 2 differ from each other (Penrose, 1996;Diósi, 1989Diósi, & 2005. If the superposition consists of a rigid mass at different locations, equation (1) expresses the mechanical work, which is needed to separate the masses from each other under the assumption that gravitation acts between them.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the framework of Diósi and Penrose are distinct, both draw a similar conclusion concerning the collapse mechanism. For a review of four gravity-driven decoherence models including these two, the interested reader is directed to [18]. Additionally, a resurgence of work involving the Schrödinger-Newton equations [19,20] has sought to further the investigations of gravity's role in state vector evolution.…”
Section: Gravitationally-induced Collapse: Objective Reduction (Or)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should finally be noted that variation of the gravitational constant impacts any gravity-driven collapse mechanism (e.g. see [18]), irrespective of the existence of extra dimensions.…”
Section: Time Variation Of the Gravitational Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%