2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-97332004000500045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological charge screening and pseudoscalar glueballs

Abstract: Topological charge screening in the QCD vacuum is found to provide crucial nonperturbative contributions to the short-distance expansion of the pseudoscalar (0 −+ ) glueball correlator. The screening contributions enter the Wilson coefficients and are an indispensable complement to the direct instanton contributions. They restore consistency with the anomalous axial Ward identity and remedy several flaws in the 0 −+ glueball sum rules caused by direct instantons in the absence of screening (lack of resonance s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19]. However, this state lies considerably lower than the theoretical expectations: the lattice QCD predictions suggest a glueball around 2.5 GeV [36,59]; the mass scale of the pseudoscalar glueball obtained in the QCD sum rule approach is above 2 GeV [7,15,16,60]. Moreover, there are attractive arguments for the scalar and pseudoscalar glueballs being approximately degenerate in mass [61], and even the scenario that a pseudoscalar glueball may be lower in mass than the scalar one was recently discussed in Ref.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[19]. However, this state lies considerably lower than the theoretical expectations: the lattice QCD predictions suggest a glueball around 2.5 GeV [36,59]; the mass scale of the pseudoscalar glueball obtained in the QCD sum rule approach is above 2 GeV [7,15,16,60]. Moreover, there are attractive arguments for the scalar and pseudoscalar glueballs being approximately degenerate in mass [61], and even the scenario that a pseudoscalar glueball may be lower in mass than the scalar one was recently discussed in Ref.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[13]. However, this state lies considerably lower than the theoretical expectations: the lattice QCD predictions suggest a glueball around 2.5GeV [44,45]; the mass scale of the pseudoscalar glueball obtained in the QCD sum rule approach is above 2GeV [37,38,40,7]. On the other hand, there are attractive arguments for the approximately degenerate in mass for the scalar and pseudoscalar glueballs [46], and even the scenario that a pseudoscalar glueball may be lower in mass than the scalar one is recently discussed in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…An other serious problem in the 0 −+ glueball sum rule approach is that the fundamental spectral positivity bound is violated when including the strong repulsive pure instanton contribution, and as a consequence, the signal for the pseudoscalar glueball disappears [39]. To cure this pathology of positivity violation, the topological charge screening effect in the QCD vacuum is added to the correlation function, and a suitable instanton size distribu-tion is taken into account [40,7]. However, as comparing with the interference contribution, which we have recalculated in this paper, and the pure perturbative one in the considered energy region, the topological screening effect turns out to be negligible; and the pathology of positivity violation disappears when including the interference contribution (s. below).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%