2003
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-97332003000300008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lee-Yang theory of equilibrium and nonequilibrium phase transitions

Abstract: We present a pedagogical account of the Lee-Yang theory of equilibrium phase transitions and review recent advances in applying this theory to nonequilibrium systems. Through both general considerations and explicit studies of specific models, we show that the Lee-Yang approach can be used to locate and classify phase transitions in nonequilibrium steady states. I IntroductionIn this work we seek a mathematical understanding of phase transitions in the steady state of stochastic many-body systems. Systems at e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
113
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
113
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is predicted that the model has two different phases and in one phase the density profile of the particles has a shock structure. We have confirmed our numerical results by using the Yang-Lee theory of phase transitions [18] which has recently been shown to be applicable to the study of critical behaviors of out-of-equilibrium systems [19,20]. In the present work we will show that by working in the canonical ensemble, the model is exactly solvable in the sense that the thermodynamic limit of physical quantities can be calculated exactly.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…It is predicted that the model has two different phases and in one phase the density profile of the particles has a shock structure. We have confirmed our numerical results by using the Yang-Lee theory of phase transitions [18] which has recently been shown to be applicable to the study of critical behaviors of out-of-equilibrium systems [19,20]. In the present work we will show that by working in the canonical ensemble, the model is exactly solvable in the sense that the thermodynamic limit of physical quantities can be calculated exactly.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the case of a complex Hamiltonian, however, the associated eigenfunctions need not be analytic in the parameters of the Hamiltonian, and phase transitions can be seen in finite matrix Hamiltonians (see, e.g., [2]). This situation is reminiscent of the analysis proposed by Lee and Yang [3,4], where the breakdown of analyticity associated with the canonical density function in Equation (1) can be explained by extending the parameters into a complex domain (see, e.g., [5] for a heuristic but informative exposition of the Lee-Yang theory). In this case, the canonical density function can exhibit lack of analyticity even in a system with finitely many degrees of freedom, in a way that resembles the eigenstates of finite complex Hamiltonians (see also [6] for a related point of view on these issues).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…and therefore the phase transition is of second-order [12]. The canonical partition function (7) as a function of β does not have any real and positive root smaller than one in this case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In order to study the phase transitions of the ASEP in canonical ensemble with open boundaries and parallel dynamics, we use the classical Yang-Lee theory by investigating the zeros of (7) in the complex plane of both α and β for different values of L and M. The particle concentration at odd and even sites will also be calculated from (10) and (11) the phase diagram of the model consists of a low-density and a shock phase which are separated by a second-order phase transition at β c = 2ρ. The reason that the phase transition is of a second-order is that the zeros of (7) as a function of β, approach the positive real-β axis at an angle π 4 [12]. The canonical partition function (7) as a function of α, does not have any real and positive root smaller than one in this case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%