2003
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-97332003000100003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to quantum Monte Carlo simulations for fermionic systems

Abstract: We tutorially review the determinantal Quantum Monte Carlo method for fermionic systems, using the Hubbard model as a case study. Starting with the basic ingredients of Monte Carlo simulations for classical systems, we introduce aspects such as importance sampling, sources of errors, and finite-size scaling analyses. We then set up the preliminary steps to prepare for the simulations, showing that they are actually carried out by sampling discrete Hubbard-Stratonovich auxiliary fields. In this process the Gree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
137
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
137
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work, comparing 2D 4 × 4, 6 × 6, and 8 × 8 Hubbard lattices 7,10 and 3D 4 × 4 × 4 and 6 × 6 × 6 lattices 7 was inconclusive. In both the 2D and 3D cases, for example, for some parameter ranges S was actually worst for the smallest systems studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous work, comparing 2D 4 × 4, 6 × 6, and 8 × 8 Hubbard lattices 7,10 and 3D 4 × 4 × 4 and 6 × 6 × 6 lattices 7 was inconclusive. In both the 2D and 3D cases, for example, for some parameter ranges S was actually worst for the smallest systems studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although one can formally use the absolute value as a weight, and include the sign in the measurement, in practice one ends up evaluating the ratio of two numbers, which becomes dominated by statistical error at low temperatures as they both become very small. This situation is known as the "fermion sign problem", 6,7 whose solution is conjectured to be NPhard. 8 At present, therefore, there is no known method of accessing the low temperature properties of Hamiltonians like the Fermi-Hubbard model with QMC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28] There are many different approximate techniques that can be used, but the intention of this paper is to establish fundamentally exact procedures that avoid the Fermi sign problem. As reported earlier, [29][30][31] the Gaussian method has been successfully applied to the difficult case of the repulsive Hubbard model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that for the Hubbard model the Gaussian representation leads to imaginarytime equations with no negative probabilities or weights. We demonstrate that this removes the well-known Fermi sign problem [1,2,3], by first principles numerical simulation without fixed-node[4] or variational approximations.Phase-space methods[5] provide a way to simulate quantum many-body systems both dynamically and at finite temperature, and have proved useful in bosonic cases. These methods sample the time evolution of a positive distribution on an overcomplete basis set, which is usually the set of coherent states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an application of the method to a dynamical calculation, in particular to a composite Bose/Fermi system, , σ(g (2) ) x10 3 Figure 1: Second-order correlation function g (2) versus inverse temperature τ for t = 0, U = 2 and µ = 1, for which nj = 0.5. The solid curve gives the simulation result, and the dashed and dot-dashed line show the estimated sampling error and deviation from the analytic result, respectively (on a ×1000 scale).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%