2001
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-97332001000100004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applications of the Schwinger Multichannel method with pseudopotentials to electron scattering from polyatomic molecules II: rotational excitation cross sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially in the low-energy region where the projectile spends a longer time with the target molecule, the coupling between the electronic and rovibrational motions is relevant and must be adequately treated. To tackle this situation, approaches with different coupling schemes, namely, the adiabatic nuclei (AN) model [5], the rotational laboratory-frame close-coupling (LFCC) approximation [6][7][8][9], the body-frame vibrational close-coupling (BFVCC) approximation [6][7][8][9], etc, can be employed in such studies. However, the applicability of the different theoretical methods depends on the energy of the incident particle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in the low-energy region where the projectile spends a longer time with the target molecule, the coupling between the electronic and rovibrational motions is relevant and must be adequately treated. To tackle this situation, approaches with different coupling schemes, namely, the adiabatic nuclei (AN) model [5], the rotational laboratory-frame close-coupling (LFCC) approximation [6][7][8][9], the body-frame vibrational close-coupling (BFVCC) approximation [6][7][8][9], etc, can be employed in such studies. However, the applicability of the different theoretical methods depends on the energy of the incident particle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rows distinguish between different transitions. Red lines: present work; orange lines:Machado et al (2002); purple lines:Brescansin et al (1989); dark blue lines:Jain and Thompson (1983); light blue lines:Varella et al (2001); green circles:Müller et al (1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%