2000
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-97332000000200002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An introduction to quintessence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the above mentioned candidates for quintessence have interesting features that make them at some level compatible with the recent obervational facts (see, for example, [6,7,8,9]). Although most of these scenarios have been extensively explored in the recent literature, in the case of a Chaplygin gas-type dark energy, however, only few analysis have focused attention on its cosmological consequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…All the above mentioned candidates for quintessence have interesting features that make them at some level compatible with the recent obervational facts (see, for example, [6,7,8,9]). Although most of these scenarios have been extensively explored in the recent literature, in the case of a Chaplygin gas-type dark energy, however, only few analysis have focused attention on its cosmological consequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Since the consequences of a cosmological constant and a rolling scalar field (usually considered the best candidates) have already been extensively discussed in recent review papers [13], in the present work we emphasize only the main results related to the remaining dark energy candidates.…”
Section: Einsteinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is natural to start with cosmology, moving towards the local aspects of gravitation. The presently popular quintessence model features a slowly decaying scalar field associated with a phenomenological potential with a small energy density, of the order of today's value of the Hubble parameter H 0 ∼ 10 −42 GeV [6]. One known criticism to this model is that it is difficult to conciliate such small repulsive new force with the present efforts to solve the hierarchy problem for fundamental interactions [7].…”
Section: History and Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%