1998
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-97331998000200007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractals and the Distribution of Galaxies

Abstract: This paper presents a review of the fractal approach for describing the large scale distribution of galaxies. We start by presenting a brief, but general, introduction to fractals, which emphasizes their empirical side and applications rather than their mathematical side. Then we discuss the standard correlation function analysis of galaxy catalogues and many observational facts that brought increasing doubts about the reliability of this method, paying special attention to the standard analysis implicit assum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The controversy started with Pietronero's (1987) claims that the usual correlation statistics employed in the characterization of the distribution of galaxies cannot be applied to this distribution, and that a novel statistical technique proposed by him is capable of testing, rather than assuming, whether or not the galaxy distribution is uniform. 5 The main results reached by this side of the debate are the absence of any sign of homogenization of the distribution of galaxies up to the limits of current observations, denying, thus, any usefulness to a correlation length concept (see §1 above), and that this distribution is well described as forming a single fractal structure, with dimension D ≈ 2 (Coleman and Pietronero 1992;Pietronero et al 1997;Ribeiro and Miguelote 1998;SylosLabini et al 1998;Pietronero and Sylos-Labini 2000).…”
Section: The Fractal Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controversy started with Pietronero's (1987) claims that the usual correlation statistics employed in the characterization of the distribution of galaxies cannot be applied to this distribution, and that a novel statistical technique proposed by him is capable of testing, rather than assuming, whether or not the galaxy distribution is uniform. 5 The main results reached by this side of the debate are the absence of any sign of homogenization of the distribution of galaxies up to the limits of current observations, denying, thus, any usefulness to a correlation length concept (see §1 above), and that this distribution is well described as forming a single fractal structure, with dimension D ≈ 2 (Coleman and Pietronero 1992;Pietronero et al 1997;Ribeiro and Miguelote 1998;SylosLabini et al 1998;Pietronero and Sylos-Labini 2000).…”
Section: The Fractal Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In limit → 0, the measure L becomes asymptotically equal to the length of the real curve and is independent of (Ribeiro and Miguelote, 1998).…”
Section: Point Density and Point Spacingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, these two quantities are fundamental in the characterization of a single fractal structure (Ribeiro and Miguelote 1998), they can also be expected to be equally fundamental in the fractal characterization of the perturbed model considered here.…”
Section: Observational Relations Along the Past Null Conementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Ribeiro (1992b) showed that an unperturbed EdS model does not have scale invariant features, in the sense of not having a power law decay of the average density at increasing depths, it, nevertheless, also showed very clearly that there is indeed a strong decay of the average density at increasing values of the luminosity distance or the redshift, an effect termed by Ribeiro (1995) as "observational inhomogeneity of the standard model". 2 Bearing this result in mind, it is only natural to ask whether or not a perturbed model could turn the density decay at increasing redshift depths into a power law type decay, as predicted, and claimed to be observed, by the scale invariant description of galaxy clustering (Pietronero 1987;Coleman and Pietronero 1992;Pietronero et al 1997;Ribeiro and Miguelote 1998;Sylos-Labini et al 1998;Pietronero and Sylos-Labini 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation