1997
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-97331997000400007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Photoionization Cross Sections and Asymmetry Parameters for Ethylene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, both frozen-core HF (FCHF) and continuum multiple scattering (CMS) calculations are not able to predict the strong oscillatory behavior of the experimental data in this energy range but show a smooth decreasing behavior. 61,66 In the near-threshold energy range, the CIS-5ch profile is in somewhat better agreement with both TDDFT and the experimental data, compared to the CIS-2ch profile. However, there are some discrepancies between ionization of H 2 .The available experimental data from the literature 78,79 have also been reported.…”
Section: Journal Of Chemical Theory and Computationsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, both frozen-core HF (FCHF) and continuum multiple scattering (CMS) calculations are not able to predict the strong oscillatory behavior of the experimental data in this energy range but show a smooth decreasing behavior. 61,66 In the near-threshold energy range, the CIS-5ch profile is in somewhat better agreement with both TDDFT and the experimental data, compared to the CIS-2ch profile. However, there are some discrepancies between ionization of H 2 .The available experimental data from the literature 78,79 have also been reported.…”
Section: Journal Of Chemical Theory and Computationsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…It is interesting to note (i) the good agreement between TDDFT and CIS-5ch profiles for both partial cross section and asymmetry parameter and (ii) the CIS-2ch calculation gives results in better agreement with the experimental data, which is surprising, and probably fortuitous, but consistent with the good agreement between the experimental data and predictions from single-channel theories, as observed in the literature. 61,66 For higher excitation energies, the calculated cross-sectional profiles rapidly converge to the experimental data available, while the CIS-5ch and TDDFT asymmetry parameter profiles are observed to underestimate the experimental data.…”
Section: Journal Of Chemical Theory and Computationmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This procedure has proven to be numerically robust and capable of providing a quantitative description of the photoionization dynamics in molecular systems studied to date. [23][24][25][26] Although this method was developed in the early eighties for photoionization studies of linear systems, 23,24 it has been extended to nonlinear polyatomic molecules 25,26 and still constitutes one of a few tools for carrying out ab initio calculations of cross sections and asymmetry parameters for photoionization of such systems. The comparison between the calculated results, even in the exact static-exchange ͑SE͒ level, with the experimental data would provide information on the role played by important physical effects, e.g., target electronic correlation, multichannel coupling, correlation-polarization effects, etc., not included in the calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%