2014
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162014000300007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seed size-number trade-off in Euterpe edulis in plant communities of the Atlantic Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, plants face a trade‐off between seed size and seed numbers (Smith and Fretwell , Venable , Eriksson and Jakobsson , Turnbull et al. , Brancalion and Rodrigues ). Plants that produce a large amount of seeds typically produce smaller seeds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, plants face a trade‐off between seed size and seed numbers (Smith and Fretwell , Venable , Eriksson and Jakobsson , Turnbull et al. , Brancalion and Rodrigues ). Plants that produce a large amount of seeds typically produce smaller seeds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seedlings emerging from large-sized seeds are more likely to have higher fitness at the post-seedling stage (Leishman et al 2000). Nevertheless, plants face a trade-off between seed size and seed numbers (Smith and Fretwell 1974, Venable 1992, Eriksson and Jakobsson 1999, Turnbull et al 1999, Brancalion and Rodrigues 2014. Plants that produce a large amount of seeds typically produce smaller seeds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Accordingly, several intra-specific studies have shown negative relationships between seed number and size at the plant [ 3 , 8 ] and fruit level [ 3 , 4 , 9 , 10 , 11 ], or across populations [ 12 , 13 ]. However, intra-specific studies have also shown a large number of exceptions (see review in [ 14 ]), with the number of seeds and their size often being uncorrelated [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ] or even positively associated [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%