2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162012000400002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Analytical and numerical comparisons of two methods of estimation of additive × additive interaction of QTL effects

Abstract: Epistasis (additive × additive interaction) plays an important role in the genetic architecture of complex traits. This study presents analytical and numerical comparisons of two methods of estimation of additive × additive interaction of QTL effects. In the first method, we observed only the plant phenotype, while in the second method we have additional information from the molecular markers observations. In this study, two data sets were analyzed:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the analysis of the HT DH lines in the four cases (NM in MB92, H in ON93a, L in ON92a and L in ON92b), epistatic effects showed only loci with significant additive effects-differences aa-aa g equal to 0 (compared with results presented by Bocianowski 2012b). In 38 cases, the epistatic effects calculated as locus 9 locus interactions were non-significant (see Bocianowski 2012b). In this paper, those effects were statistically significant different aa-aa g = aa (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After the analysis of the HT DH lines in the four cases (NM in MB92, H in ON93a, L in ON92a and L in ON92b), epistatic effects showed only loci with significant additive effects-differences aa-aa g equal to 0 (compared with results presented by Bocianowski 2012b). In 38 cases, the epistatic effects calculated as locus 9 locus interactions were non-significant (see Bocianowski 2012b). In this paper, those effects were statistically significant different aa-aa g = aa (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Therefore, CDO105-BCD135 might be a pleiotropic pair of loci or very tight linkage. Additionally, in the Tables 1, 2 and 3 are presented differences between epistatic effects assessed using all loci (aa) and epistatic effects assessed using only loci with significant additive effects (aa g ), it should be noted that the aa g values have been presented in previous studies (Bocianowski 2008(Bocianowski , 2012b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effect of additive-by-additive interaction (epistasis) was estimated on the basis of phenotypic observations according to Bocianowski (2012a). This method requires the identification of groups of extreme lines, i.e., lines with the minimal and maximal expression levels of the trait under consideration.…”
Section: Qtl Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%