2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162007000300004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock-scion interactions on growth and rubber yield of Hevea brasiliensis

Abstract: Rubber tree cultivation [Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. ex Adr. de Juss.) Muell.-Arg.] uses mostly the budding propagation method, however the expected stand uniformity due to the use of vegetative propagation is theoretical, since high variation for yield and vigor is caused by rootstock influence. The objective of this study was to assess several combinations between clonal rootstocks and clone scions through diallel analysis, aiming at high productivity and vigor. Data consisted of five years of dry rubber yiel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Yield is controlled by the root-stock in various perennial species including the rubber tree (Cardinal et al 2007), grape (Soar et al 2006; Main et al 2002), peach (Tsipouridis and Thomidis 2005), mango (Smith et al 2003), sweet cherry (Whiting et al 2005; Robinson et al 2006), pear (Bertelsen and Callesen 2001; North and Cook 2008), clementine (Bassal 2009) and apricot (Hernández et al 2010). The changes in yield varied up to 6.5-fold (Whiting et al 2005) depending on the crop and the type of rootstocks examined.…”
Section: Physiological Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yield is controlled by the root-stock in various perennial species including the rubber tree (Cardinal et al 2007), grape (Soar et al 2006; Main et al 2002), peach (Tsipouridis and Thomidis 2005), mango (Smith et al 2003), sweet cherry (Whiting et al 2005; Robinson et al 2006), pear (Bertelsen and Callesen 2001; North and Cook 2008), clementine (Bassal 2009) and apricot (Hernández et al 2010). The changes in yield varied up to 6.5-fold (Whiting et al 2005) depending on the crop and the type of rootstocks examined.…”
Section: Physiological Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of these interactions on several aspects of plant growth and development is an area under extensive investigation for the past many years (Rogers and Beakbane 1957;Webster 2004;Martinez-Ballesta et al 2010;Koepke and Dhingra 2013). In the case of an out-breeding tree species like rubber, the impact of these interactions is well apparent by the intraclonal variations observed in latex yield (Cardinal et al 2007). Since rubber is an economically important crop where the major agronomic trait of interest is latex yield from the bark, plant to plant intraclonal variation may have huge impact on the productivity of plantations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of H. brasiliensis, the influence of rootstocks on the growth and yield of the scion was well demonstrated by Ng et al (1981). Subsequent studies with respect to growth and rubber yield in Hevea by Cardinal et al (2007) show that selection of rootstock material is vital for obtaining compatibility values for dry rubber yield. Evidence for this type of interactions at the protein level was provided by Almansa et al (2002) in lemon tree leaves where they proved that the superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in the leaves was rootstock controlled and varied more by rootstock than the salt levels tested when different rootstocks were used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production of clonal rootstocks is still not commercially feasible. Estimation of general compatibility (rootstocks and scion) and specific compatibility (for all combinations of six rootstocks and scions) for rubber yield, showed a strong rootstock effect on yield (CARDINAL et al, 2007). Long term data related to the effect of rootstock on scion performance in the traditional rubber growing belt of southern India is meager, and most of the previous studies were confined to parameters other than long term growth and yield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%