1997
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90161997000300015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The life-time concept as a tool for erosion tolerance definition

Abstract: ABSTRACT:By definition, erosion tolerance should consider the conservation of the soil as a natural resource essential for crop production. Erosion rates greater than soil renewal will cause soil depth loss. A minimum soil depth was defined as the depth in which the inputs (fertilizers, crop residues) and management technology (irrigation, improved genetic crop quality) were insufficient to prevent economic productivity loss. Thus, erosion rates greater than soil formation are acceptable only during the time i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Montgomery (2007) noted a reasonable historical pattern of 500-to several-thousand-year life spans for major civilizations around the world. Other studies have expressed soil loss tolerance using the concept of "soil life time" (Sparovek and Schnug 2001;Sparovek et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Montgomery (2007) noted a reasonable historical pattern of 500-to several-thousand-year life spans for major civilizations around the world. Other studies have expressed soil loss tolerance using the concept of "soil life time" (Sparovek and Schnug 2001;Sparovek et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A partir de 1990, no entanto, a USP/Esalq deu início a uma seqüência de publicações que se distinguiu por discutir aspectos e conceitos variados em um contexto de planejamento de uso e ocupação da terra no meio rural. Essa linha multifacetada, conduzida, entre outros, por G. Sparovek, começou abordando a relação entre erosão e produtividade, migrando para a discussão do conceito de tolerância à erosão e desenvolvimento de indicadores de risco de degradação (Sparovek et al, 1991(Sparovek et al, , 1993(Sparovek et al, , 1997Salviano et al, 1998;Ranieri et al, 1998). A partir do ano 2000, esse grupo desenvolveu trabalhos em que incorporou ferramentas de geoprocessamento mescladas a modelos de predição ou estimativa de erosão (USLE, WEEP, 137 Cs) e à discussão de impactos ambientais.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…It comprises seven decision rules, that is, equality (ER), dominance (DOR), bimodality (BR), masking (MR), aggravating (AR), dependence (DER) and independence (IR), generated specifically for characterization of real non-ordered erosion combination processes prevailing in the study area (64 real cases of a total of 216 possible cases) ( Table I). For example, the DER was closely related to soil depth, which is necessary for determining critical tolerance values for erosion (Sparovek et al, 1997;Whiting et al, 2001). Thus, a shallow soil (depth <1 m) can be considered as higher erosion risk area than deep one (depth >1 m).…”
Section: Prioritization Of Erosion Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%