2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782012005000120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant growth regulator losses in cotton as affected by adjuvants and rain

Abstract: Most of Brazilian cotton is produced in regions 0, 0.75, 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0 0, 0,75; 1,5; 3,0; 6,0; 12,0

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of a growth regulator to reduce plant size provides a greater balance between reproductive and vegetative parts, which favors reduced competition for photoassimilates between vegetative and reproductive growth (Lamas and Ferreira, 2015). Furthermore, it promotes higher fruit retention in the first positions, a fact that culminates in higher yield (Echer and Rosolem, 2012). The cultivar FM 975 produced the largest amount of cotton boll relative to that of the other cultivars (Table 7), although it was the genotype that presented the highest severity of leaf spot (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of a growth regulator to reduce plant size provides a greater balance between reproductive and vegetative parts, which favors reduced competition for photoassimilates between vegetative and reproductive growth (Lamas and Ferreira, 2015). Furthermore, it promotes higher fruit retention in the first positions, a fact that culminates in higher yield (Echer and Rosolem, 2012). The cultivar FM 975 produced the largest amount of cotton boll relative to that of the other cultivars (Table 7), although it was the genotype that presented the highest severity of leaf spot (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, higher PGR rates were applied for the CGR method, if compared with the traditional recommendation, most likely due to the amount applied in the fourth application (86 DAE) (Table 3), when PGR rates were almost double the traditional management approach. The possibility of PGR losses due to rainfall occurring after application does exist (Echer & Rosolem 2012) and it could be a disadvantage of this method, once the PGR rate increases as plants grow higher. Johnson & Pettigrew (2006) also observed no interaction between PGR management and cotton cultivars on plant height, as reported in our experiment (2012/2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the balance between biomass production and harvest index negatively affected especially in excessive irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer use (Mondino et al, 1999). Plant growth regulators (PGR) are applied to eliminate negative effects and manipulate cotton plant architecture (Echer and Rosolem, 2012) and improve lint yield and fiber quality (Zhao and Oosterhuis, 2000). The plant growth regulators such as mepiquat chloride (MC) and chlormequat chloride (CCC) extensively used to control the overgrowth of the plant in cotton production areas of Turkey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%