2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782012000800012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Análises Biplot: conceitos, interpretações e aplicações

Abstract: II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The hybrid AGN 30A37H (g7) showed the best stability as it is closest to the center of the biplot (SILVA, BENIN, 2012), while the DKB bi9440 (g10) was the least stable, as shown in Figures 2,3,4 and 5. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The hybrid AGN 30A37H (g7) showed the best stability as it is closest to the center of the biplot (SILVA, BENIN, 2012), while the DKB bi9440 (g10) was the least stable, as shown in Figures 2,3,4 and 5. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Research by Silva and Benin (2012) demonstrated the effectiveness of the AMMI model to select the best cultivation environments and the most suitable genotypes for each situation. Benin et al (2012) showed the response of eight wheat genotypes grown in two crops under four management levels, where 73% of the effects were due to the environment for grain yield.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the use of the AMMI technique (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis) combines analysis of variance (univariate) and the main components (multivariate), where it adjusts the effects of genotypes, environments, and G x E interaction (Zobel et al, 1988;Silva and Benin, 2012). This statistical technique is composed of an additive fraction that brings together the general average, the genotypic and environmental effects, the residual effects composed by the multiplicative proportion of the model, and then the additive and multiplicative terms of the G x E interaction .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose of the AMMI analysis is to select models that explain the "pattern" related to the interaction, neglecting the "noise". According to Silva and Benin (2012), there is a greater presence of a "pattern" in the first two axes (PCAs), and there is a gradual increase in "noise" in the second axis due to the loss of degrees of freedom associated with the sum of squares of the GxE interaction, reducing the predictive power of the analysis. Thus, the graphic interpretation was performed considering only the biplots AMMI1 (PCA1 x variable) and AMMI2 (PCA1 x PCA2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%