2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782011005000005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variability in maize and teosinte populations estimated by microsatellites markers

Abstract: Wild species are important sources of genetic variability and may be exploited by breeding programs. Crosses between teosinte and maize occur freely and teosinte serves as genetic source of agronomic traits for introduction in maize.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The level of polymorphism was similar to those reported by Wiethölter et al (2008), who detected 2.7 alleles per locus in the analysis of 33 microsatellite loci in maize, and Le Clere et al (2005), who analyzed 133 maize cultivars using 51 microsatellite loci and obtained 2.9 alleles per locus on average. In contrast, in the studies by Menkir et al (2004), Adeyemo et al (2011), andTerra et al (2011), the number of alleles ranged from 3.7 to 5.7 per locus. These authors attributed such high polymorphism to the level of divergence found within the genotypes evaluated in conjunction with the pre-selection of the primers that was based on the number and quality of the amplification products.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The level of polymorphism was similar to those reported by Wiethölter et al (2008), who detected 2.7 alleles per locus in the analysis of 33 microsatellite loci in maize, and Le Clere et al (2005), who analyzed 133 maize cultivars using 51 microsatellite loci and obtained 2.9 alleles per locus on average. In contrast, in the studies by Menkir et al (2004), Adeyemo et al (2011), andTerra et al (2011), the number of alleles ranged from 3.7 to 5.7 per locus. These authors attributed such high polymorphism to the level of divergence found within the genotypes evaluated in conjunction with the pre-selection of the primers that was based on the number and quality of the amplification products.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Terra et al (2011) and Adeyemo et al (2011) also reported the efficiency of microsatellite markers in studies of genetic diversity. However, even highly polymorphic molecular markers allow for negative correlation of genetic diversity with heterosis, which is explained by the absence of dominance, the fact that allelic frequencies of parental lines are not negatively correlated, the fact that markers are not associated with a quantitative trait locus (QTL) for the character, and because the productivity does not have high heritability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last several years, sweet corn production improvements in Brazil have consisted of obtaining hybrids (Kwiatkowski et al, 2011) and assessing diverse germplasm (Almeida et al, 2011;Terra et al, 2011) to form a broad genetic basis for local farmers. Information about genetic diversity in corn is essential to germplasm characterization and utilization (Gerdes and Tracy, 1994;Kashiani et al, 2012;Liu et al, 2003;Nigussie and Saleh, 2007;Revilla et al, 2005;Srdić et al, 2011;Tracy et al, 2000;Yousef and Juvik, 2001), particularly among the sul germplasm from southern Brazil (Amorin et al, 2003;Barbosa-Neto et al, 2005;Bered et al, 2005;Rupp et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSR features high reproducibility, accuracy, and discrimination. Owing to their specificity and ease of detection, SSRs are one of the main markers used to characterize the genetic resources of plants via the genotyping of germplasm collections and analysis of genetic diversity (Adeyemo et al, 2011;Terra et al, 2011). AFLP is a nearly ideal system because it allows the assessment of genetic diversity across individuals, populations, and species (Laborda et al, 2005;Hartings et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%