2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782010005000194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Padrões de comportamento ingestivo de cordeiras recebendo ou não suplemento em pastagem de milheto

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since concentrate supplementation was expected to reflect directly on forage intake owing to the substitution effect, the sheep receiving the low level of supplementation showed a greater grazing intensity in this study. These results disagree with those of Confortin et al (2010) in a study in which ewes were supplemented. They reported a reduction in diurnal grazing time and increased time devoted to other activities, although patterns of intake, displacement and demand were unchanged.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since concentrate supplementation was expected to reflect directly on forage intake owing to the substitution effect, the sheep receiving the low level of supplementation showed a greater grazing intensity in this study. These results disagree with those of Confortin et al (2010) in a study in which ewes were supplemented. They reported a reduction in diurnal grazing time and increased time devoted to other activities, although patterns of intake, displacement and demand were unchanged.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In the current research no significant (P <0.05) interacting effects were found between breed x supplementation level, breed x period and breed x supplementation level x period in ingestive behaviour. Confortin et al (2010) reported that patterns of animal feeding behaviour under diets supplemented or unsupplemented depend on the structural characteristics of the pasture to which they are subjected throughout the grazing period. Therefore, grazing time was not affected (P >0.05) by supplementation (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was no change in the grazing patterns of sheep, possibly owing to an excess of rumen-degradable protein in the supplement, and therefore they used the pasture to compensate for the excess protein and maintain a good protein:fermentable carbohydrate ratio for homeostasis in the rumen (Silva et al, 2015). In contrast, Confortin et al (2010) reported a reduction in diurnal grazing time and an increased amount of time devoted to other activities; however, patterns of intake, displacement, and demand were unchanged.…”
Section: Time Spent Grazingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the ingestive behavior has been used as a tool to evaluate diets that allows for the adjustment of the animal-feeding management in order to achieve better performance (Confortin et al, 2010;Pereira et al, 2011;Pinheiro et al, 2011;Santana Júnior et al, 2013b), guiding and reinforcing various discussions about intake. Thus, these associations are cited as hypotheses rather than the objective of research, and so the measurements of these correlations may break some paradigms, because probably not all behavioral variables are correlated with productive results (Santana Júnior et al, 2013a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%