1997
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84781997000300014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ocorrência de Actinomyces suis em fêmeas em produção provenientes de granjas com transtornos reprodutivos localizadas no planalto Catarinense - Santa Catarina

Abstract: O presente estudo foi realizado em sete propriedades no Planalto Catarinense, os quais apresentavam algum histórico de transtorno reprodutivo. Foram coletadas 101 amostras de urinas de matrizes em produção. Foi colhida uma amostra da primeira urina espontânea da manhã e foi feito imunofluorescência indireta a partir de esfregaços do sedimento urinário. As lâminas foram avaliadas e classificadas como negativas (ausência de bastonete ou raros bastonetes com fluorescência leve) e positiva (presença de bastonetes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reis et al [ 13 ], and Menin et al [ 14 ] isolated the agent from 2.0% (1/60) and 4.0% (37/922) of the cases examined in Brazil. Vaz et al [ 6 ] and Porto et al [ 4 ] reported A. suis prevalence rates of 16.8% (17/101) and 31.4% (11/35), respectively, using IF in Brazilian herds. The frequency found in the present study lies within the ranges previously described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reis et al [ 13 ], and Menin et al [ 14 ] isolated the agent from 2.0% (1/60) and 4.0% (37/922) of the cases examined in Brazil. Vaz et al [ 6 ] and Porto et al [ 4 ] reported A. suis prevalence rates of 16.8% (17/101) and 31.4% (11/35), respectively, using IF in Brazilian herds. The frequency found in the present study lies within the ranges previously described.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urine collections were performed during spontaneous urination of sows, before the first feeding, discarding the first urine streams and colleting a minimum sample of 100 mL, starting from the second half of urination. These samples were collected in sterile flasks, open only at the time of collection (Vaz et al, 2007;Alberton et al, 2000).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%