Biossegurança e a dimensão subjetiva do trabalho e do risco

Navarro, Marli B. M. de Albuquerque; Cardoso, Telma Abdalla de Oliveira

doi:10.1590/s0103-73312009000400002

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[2][3][4][5] The challenges placed on public health have been discussed, notwithstanding that in terms of global concerns; they entail factors confi guring the construction of worldwide calamity implementation. 6 Among these challenges, implementation of Biosafety has also been placed as a fi eld which encompasses the complexity of risk monitoring and its articulation with health surveillance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health surveillance, biosafety and emergence and re-emergence of infectious diseases in Brazil

Cardoso¹,

Navarro²,

Neto³

et al. 2010

Braz J Infect Dis

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present paper presents compulsory notifi cation data for infectious diseases and epidemiologic ones recorded at the Center for Strategic Information and Health Surveillance (CIEVS) for the period of March 2006 to April 2007. Data is presented in accordance with geographic distribution, time and risk classifi cation of the etiologic agents found, according to Ministry of Health regulations. The importance of this epidemiologic surveillance system is presented, debating the main topics required for quality improvement and information analysis. It is concluded, from the analysis of epidemiologic events and their relation to risk management, that the compulsory notifi cation system in Brazil is incomplete, irregular, delayed and, in a large percentage of cases, notifi cation cannot be completed and the agent may not be identifi ed. Quality of data varies from one region to another and from county to county within the same region. There is a high proportion of cases in which the etiologic agent is unknown and, in such cases, a high lethality is expected, establishing a high risk exposure condition for those health professionals involved in health surveillance. From these data, the study points out the need to improve the surveillance system and strengthens the idea of building maximum containment laboratories.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health surveillance, biosafety and emergence and re-emergence of infectious diseases in Brazil

Cardoso¹,

Navarro²,

Neto³

et al. 2010

Braz J Infect Dis

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Muitas das reavaliações das estratégias educacionais, informacionais e mesmo as intervenções pertinentes a este campo envolvem elementos de subjetividade (Navarro & Cardoso, 2009). …”

Section: Revisãounclassified

Biosafety: perspectives in the área in health

Silva¹,

Pessoa²,

Mesquita³

et al. 2015

Pubvet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO. Organização Mundial de Saúde conceituou a biossegurança como práticas de prevenção para o trabalho em laboratório com agentes patogênicos, e, além disto, classificaram os riscos como biológicos, químicos, físicos, radioativos e ergonômicos. Em decorrência disso, novos avanços e normalizações têm sido desenvolvidos para melhorar a vida das pessoas que trabalham com agentes de riscos na área da saúde. Desta forma, as ações propostas pela Biossegurança integram o conjunto de medidas preventivas que investigam, monitoram e propõem procedimentos de controle à disseminação dos agravos para atender às demandas de saúde publica. O objetivo desta revisão é fornecer conhecimentos da evolução na biossegurança através de informações recentes (1996 a 2014) sobre histórico, desenvolvimento e importância sobre a mesma, abrangendo os aspectos relevantes para maior compreensão dos cuidados dentro de um laboratório, com suas técnicas, cuidados e aspectos de controle para evitar acidentes. Palavras-chave: laboratório, prevenção, riscos, segurança do ambienteBiosafety: perspectives in the área in health ABSTRACT. World Health Organization conceptualized as biosecurity prevention practices for laboratory work with pathogens, and, moreover, rated the risks as biological, chemical, physical, ergonomic and radioactive. As a result, new developments and normalization have been developed to improve the lives of people who work with agents in health risks. Thus, the actions proposed by Biosecurity constitute the set of preventive measures that investigate, monitor and propose procedures to control the spread of infectious diseases to meet the demands of public health. The aim of this review is to provide knowledge of developments in biosafety information through recent (1996-2014) on history , development and importance on it, covering the relevant aspects for a better understanding of care within a laboratory, with its techniques, care and aspects of control to avoid accidents.

show abstract

“…The theoretical foundation of the text was based on the following authors: (ARAÚJO FILHO et al, 2016;FARIA et al, 2011;FONSECA, 2012;FREITAS et al, 2017;LIMA;BARREIRA FILHO, 2016;LA ROTTA et al, 2018;MATELLO;VALENTE, 2012;NAVARRO;CARDOSO, 2009 PENNA et al, 2010;PEREIRA et al, 2010;ROCHA;BESSA;ALMEIDA, 2012;SILVA et al, 2009;SILVA;AUGUSTO;PEREZ, 2012;SIMONETTI, 2014;SOUSA SILVA et al, 2015;SILVA;RESENDE;CAMPOS, 2016;SANTOS et al, 2020;ZOCHIO, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Infections acquired in environments have aspects that can be related, for example, to the obligation to wash hands, as well as to complex factors, mutation and resistance of biological agents. Despite the existence of specific biosafety procedures for this environment, there is a need for frequent requirements of the established, reassessing and advancing in terms of risk control (NAVARRO;CARDOSO, 2009)…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comportamento Do Profissional De Laboratório E Biossegurança

Marques

Marques²

2022

RECIMA21

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A inquietação fundamental desta pesquisa é compreender a relação biossegurança/profissional no ambiente laboral, relatar se há incidência de acidentes, funcionamento adequado dos estabelecimentos e comportamento seguro de acordo com as normas de biossegurança. Há convergências e divergências nos resultados, tornando-os inconsistentes. Concluímos que existe uma necessidade de aprofundar a pesquisa, pois há lacunas diante do que foi observado a partir da literatura analisada, há vários pontos que precisam serem avaliados, pois estes impossibilitam-se de esgotarem o tema em um espaço limitado.

show abstract

Biossegurança e a dimensão subjetiva do trabalho e do risco

Cited by 5 publications

References 8 publications

Health surveillance, biosafety and emergence and re-emergence of infectious diseases in Brazil

Health surveillance, biosafety and emergence and re-emergence of infectious diseases in Brazil

Biosafety: perspectives in the área in health

Comportamento Do Profissional De Laboratório E Biossegurança

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About