2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-50532012000600023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of copper in human hair and tea samples after dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop (DLLME-SFO)

Abstract: proposto é simples, barato e altamente preciso. Neste estudo, a otimização de parâmetros experimentais que influenciam a extração, como tipo e volume dos solventes de extração e do dispersor, pH, quantidade de agente quelante e tempo de extração foi realizada normalmente usando uma abordagem passo-a-passo, na qual cada fator variou sequencialmente. O efeito dos íons interferentes na recuperação dos analitos também foi investigado. O gráfico de calibração foi linear no intervalo de 5-200 ng mL −1 , com limite d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work a DLLME dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, SFODME solidified floating organic drop microextraction, LL-DLLME ligandlessdispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, DLLME-SFO dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction-solidified floating organic drop, IL-DLLME ionic liquid dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, HLLME homogeneous liquid-liquid extraction, CPE cloud point extraction, SPE solid phase extraction A comparison of the developed method with the other reported preconcentration methods for copper determination using FAAS is given in Table 3. By comparing the data in this table, it is clear that detection limit for the proposed method is better than or comparable to those obtained with other methods (Jamali et al 2007;Farajzadeh et al 2008Farajzadeh et al , 2009Acar and Kara 2014;Bahar and Zakerian 2012;Manzoori and Bavili-Tabrizi 2002;Ghaedi et al 2008;Sheibani et al 2011). Although some of these methods have better detection limits Ozcelik et al 2012;Şahin and Tokgöz 2010;Durukan et al 2011;Mohammadi et al 2009;Khani et al 2011), some of them need very large sample volumes (Ozcelik et al 2012;Şahin and Tokgöz 2010;Durukan et al 2011).…”
Section: Analytical Performance Of the Methods And Comparison With Othmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This work a DLLME dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, SFODME solidified floating organic drop microextraction, LL-DLLME ligandlessdispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, DLLME-SFO dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction-solidified floating organic drop, IL-DLLME ionic liquid dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, HLLME homogeneous liquid-liquid extraction, CPE cloud point extraction, SPE solid phase extraction A comparison of the developed method with the other reported preconcentration methods for copper determination using FAAS is given in Table 3. By comparing the data in this table, it is clear that detection limit for the proposed method is better than or comparable to those obtained with other methods (Jamali et al 2007;Farajzadeh et al 2008Farajzadeh et al , 2009Acar and Kara 2014;Bahar and Zakerian 2012;Manzoori and Bavili-Tabrizi 2002;Ghaedi et al 2008;Sheibani et al 2011). Although some of these methods have better detection limits Ozcelik et al 2012;Şahin and Tokgöz 2010;Durukan et al 2011;Mohammadi et al 2009;Khani et al 2011), some of them need very large sample volumes (Ozcelik et al 2012;Şahin and Tokgöz 2010;Durukan et al 2011).…”
Section: Analytical Performance Of the Methods And Comparison With Othmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Table 4 summarizes the comparison of the developed method with some existing methods coupled with FAAS detection for the determination of Fe and Cu. The limits of detection of the analytes are superior than or comparable to those acquired with other reported methods [15,[20][21][22][23][24]. Although some of these methods have better detection limits or higher preconcentration factors, they need large sample volumes [15,16,18,19,21,22].…”
Section: Analytical Features Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Increase in ionic strength resulting from salt addition causes two opposite effects on the extraction efficiency: (1) the physical properties of the Nernst diffusion film can change by the presence of dissolved salt in water, and consequently, the diffusion rate of the analyte into the drop can decrease [ 29 ]; (2) the salting-out effect can cause an increase in the extraction efficiency [ 30 ]. In order to investigate the effect of ionic strength arising from salt addition, on performance of UA-DLLME-SFO-BE, various experiments were performed by adding varying amounts of NaCl from 0% to 4% (w/v).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%