2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-50532011000800007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting partition coefficients of migrants in food simulant/polymer systems using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system

Abstract: A contaminação de alimentos pela migração de aditivos de baixo peso molecular em alimentos processados industrialmente pode ser resultado do contato direto entre a embalagem e o alimento. A concentração do aditivo que migra do material da embalagem para o alimento está relacionada com as propriedades estruturais do aditivo, bem como com a natureza do material empregado na embalagem. O objetivo deste estudo é desenvolver um modelo QSPR pela adaptação do sistema de interferência neuro-fuzzy (ANFIS) a fim de pred… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best support vector machine model (R 2 = 0•90167, MAE = 0•00117, RMSE = 0•03420 and q 2 = 0•85885) exhibit better performance than the best artificial neural networks model (R 2 = 0•80395, MAE = 0•00395, RMSE = 0•06285 and q 2 = 0•80311). As the higher values of R 2 and q 2 indicate higher predictive power of the model (Shahbazikhah et al 2011), it is clear that the support vector machine model has higher predictive power than artificial neural networks model. Support vector machine regression is suitable to be applied in QSPR studies with small datasets, since it can interpret the nonlinear relationships between a molecular structure and its properties (Juna et al 2010), while artificial neural networks generally need larger datasets to exhibit good performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The best support vector machine model (R 2 = 0•90167, MAE = 0•00117, RMSE = 0•03420 and q 2 = 0•85885) exhibit better performance than the best artificial neural networks model (R 2 = 0•80395, MAE = 0•00395, RMSE = 0•06285 and q 2 = 0•80311). As the higher values of R 2 and q 2 indicate higher predictive power of the model (Shahbazikhah et al 2011), it is clear that the support vector machine model has higher predictive power than artificial neural networks model. Support vector machine regression is suitable to be applied in QSPR studies with small datasets, since it can interpret the nonlinear relationships between a molecular structure and its properties (Juna et al 2010), while artificial neural networks generally need larger datasets to exhibit good performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This procedure was carried out 200 times. The theory behind these validation methods has been sufficiently described elsewhere (Jalali-Heravi et al, 2009;Shahbazikhah et al, 2011). The statistical results are given in Table 3 shows the stepwise MLR-LS-SVR and CART-LS-SVR models possessed all the criteria to be considered as a predictive model.…”
Section: Descriptor Selection Using Stepwise Mlr and Cart Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on the 'fuzzy partition' of input space and it can be viewed as the expansion of a piecewise linear partition [30]. A detailed description of the theory behind an ANFIS has been adequately described elsewhere [29][30][31].…”
Section: Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy Inference Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%