2002
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-50532002000500007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collision-Induced Effects on the Dielectric Properties of Liquid Dimethylsulfoxide

Abstract: É apresentado um estudo por simulação de dinâmica molecular das propriedades dielétricas do dimetil sulfóxido líquido, onde são incluídos efeitos de indução devido à polarizabilidade molecular através de perturbação em primeira ordem. Neste formalismo, os dipolos induzidos são computados a partir de trajetórias geradas pelos potenciais intermoleculares isentos de forças indutivas. Propriedades dielétricas estáticas e dinâmicas são computadas para as versões polarizável e nãopolarizável da densidade dipolar. As… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for that unexpected difference in the static permittivity (ε s DMSO ≈ 1.3ε s ACN ) must results from an essential difference in the molecular dipoleÀdipole coupling abilities occurring in liquid DMSO and ACN. The conclusion is strongly supported by the Kirkwood correlation factor (g K ) measurements which gave for DMSO the following results: g K DMSO = 1.01, 13,18 0.99, 40 1.13, 41 1.00, 42,43 0.95, 44 and 1.04 45 what quite clearly points out for the lack of the dipolar coupling in that liquid, whereas for ACN, the values are g K ACN = 0.74, 41 0.75, 46 and 0.82, 47 as expected for the liquid with molecular antiparallel dipoleÀdipole coupling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason for that unexpected difference in the static permittivity (ε s DMSO ≈ 1.3ε s ACN ) must results from an essential difference in the molecular dipoleÀdipole coupling abilities occurring in liquid DMSO and ACN. The conclusion is strongly supported by the Kirkwood correlation factor (g K ) measurements which gave for DMSO the following results: g K DMSO = 1.01, 13,18 0.99, 40 1.13, 41 1.00, 42,43 0.95, 44 and 1.04 45 what quite clearly points out for the lack of the dipolar coupling in that liquid, whereas for ACN, the values are g K ACN = 0.74, 41 0.75, 46 and 0.82, 47 as expected for the liquid with molecular antiparallel dipoleÀdipole coupling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Industrially, ACN is used, among others, as a solvent for the manufacture of pharmaceuticals and photographic films. No wonder that both compounds are the subject of numerous studies both experimentally and theoretically. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immediately striking is the significantly different behavior of the increment in neat liquids. In the case of PC, we are undoubtedly faced with a phenomenon of head-to-tail association of dipoles, whereas DMSO demonstrates, as expected, the virtual absence of aggregation of molecular dipoles. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…On the basis of the above values of ε ∞ , the calculated Kirkwood correlation factor g K equals either 1.23 (which points to the not too high but clear linear association of the head-to-tail type) or 0.57 (strongly antiparallel association). A slightly smaller, but also confusing, discrepancy concerns the dipolar association in DMSO, for which extreme values of g K of 0.52 or 1.04 can be found; however, most published data are not far from g K = 1. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dielectric relaxation in fluids of highly polar molecules is often dominated by the collective reorientation mechanism. , In addition to M 0 , a portion of M I relaxes via this mechanism. This portion can be identified by projecting M I along M 0 , using a scheme adopted from DLS. , The part of Φ( t ) that relaxes via collective reorientation is normalΦ RR ( t ) = false( 1 + G false) 2 normalΦ 00 ( t ) where G = false⟨ boldM normalI ( 0 ) · boldM 0 ( 0 ) false⟩ | M 0 | 2 = normalΦ 0 normalI ( 0 ) 2 normalΦ 00 ( 0 ) is the projection and (1 + G ) 2 acts as a local field factor, as a rescaling of M 0 by (1 + G ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%