2000
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-50532000000500016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EPR and electrochemistry of [NH4]trans-[RuCl4(DMSO)(L)] complexes (L = DMSO, py ). X-ray molecular structure of [pyH][RuCl4(DMSO)(py)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the corresponding g --values could be ascribed to the different ligands (Clor solvent) present in the inner coordination sphere. These conclusions were confirmed also by recent literature data for dissolution of Ru(III)-chloride complexes [29] or Ru(III)-mixed ligand complexes with L and Clin DMSO [26]. Here again substitution of Clby DMSO was found, the final product containing two molecules of DMSO.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between the corresponding g --values could be ascribed to the different ligands (Clor solvent) present in the inner coordination sphere. These conclusions were confirmed also by recent literature data for dissolution of Ru(III)-chloride complexes [29] or Ru(III)-mixed ligand complexes with L and Clin DMSO [26]. Here again substitution of Clby DMSO was found, the final product containing two molecules of DMSO.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Its EPR spectrum in the first case shows g -= 2.35 and g || = 1.87, values corresponding completely to the values found by us for D and shown above (2.35 8 and 1.87 9 ). Dissolution in MeOH leads once more to partial substitution of Cland appearance of MeOH in the inner coordination sphere [29]. The substitution of Clby the solvent (both MeOH and DMSO) was proven also directly by X-ray diffraction data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This is a consequence of the linear (cylindrical π-bonding) binding of CO ligand to osmium. Axial EPR spectra are also seen for complexes of type trans -[RuCl 4 (L)(Me 2 SO)] − , where L = Me 2 SO 80 or various azole ligands, e.g., pyrazole, as well as pyridine. 81 The key point, however, is not that whether a (Ru,Os) III species exhibits a rhombic or axial spectrum, but whether g ║ (i.e., the unique feature) is greater (at lower resonant magnetic field) or less (at higher field) than g ⊥ (averaging a rhombic signal if necessary).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The g values presented are all for complexes with tetraethylammonium countercation; for trans -Cs[OsCl 4 (CO)(py)]: g ⊥ = 2.46, g ║ = 1.45. c Taken from Ni Dhubhghaill et al 82 d Taken from de Paula et al 80 The g values reported are for the solid material; in aqueous or methanol solution, multiple species are reported due to replacement of Me 2 SO and/or chlorido ligands by solvent. e Taken from Clarke et al 77 The values for | g min | were not observed (hence they are given in parentheses), but were proposed by their LFT analysis. In these systems, the proper choice of sign of the g values is not apparent based on standard criteria, namely the magnitudes of k or Δ, so both choices are given.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation