1998
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-50531998000300001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial

Abstract: O sis te ma fe de ral de en si no su pe ri or do Bra sil pas sa, nes te momen to, por uma das suas mais pro fun das cri ses com res pe i to à for ma de ges tão, es co lha de di ri gen tes e po lí ti ca sa la ri al, es tan do es ta be leci do um cla ro con fron to en tre a es tru tu ra sin di cal e as ins tân ci as deci só ri as em ní vel fe de ral. As cri ses uni ver si tá ri as são in de se já ve is! Mas con fi gu ram-se em mo men tos de re fle xão pro fun da e fér te is para mu dan ças aca dê mi cas. Nes se … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative chemical shifts of pro-R and pro-S are quite different. The resonance line at high field is assigned 12 for the pro-R and at low field for pro-S. The chemical shift difference of the two signal set is 0.11 ppm and the coupling constants 2 J gem , 3 The Schemes II and III describe the synthesis of the chiral monomers (M 11 and M 4 ).…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative chemical shifts of pro-R and pro-S are quite different. The resonance line at high field is assigned 12 for the pro-R and at low field for pro-S. The chemical shift difference of the two signal set is 0.11 ppm and the coupling constants 2 J gem , 3 The Schemes II and III describe the synthesis of the chiral monomers (M 11 and M 4 ).…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%