1997
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-50531997000400008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voltammetric response of hydrogen adsorbates on platinum in acid solutions: a possible H-adatom subsurface state

Abstract: Fo ram apli ca das ro ti nas com bi na das de po ten ci al, en vol ven do var re du ras vol ta mé t ri cas e pa radas de po ten ci al, na re gião dos ad-átomos de hi dro gê nio so bre ele tro dos de Pt, em di fe r en tes so luções áci das, para pro du zir um au men to da cor ren te de pico da ele tro-desorção do "ter ce i r o" áto mo de hi dro gê nio que apa re ce cer ca de 0.22 V vs. RHE. Este pico pode ser ob ser va do para ele tro dos de Pt de di fe ren tes to po gra fi as. Apa ren te men te, a con tri bu i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, the ECSA from Pt-SnO 2 /C and Pt-Rh-SnO 2 /C may be underestimated (and thus d Elec overestimated) due to CO ad electrooxidation probably occurring during the chronoamperometry at E ad = 0.15 V vs. RHE preceding the CV. 53,54 On the one hand, the oxide region on Rh-and Sn-based electrocatalysts, i.e. on Rh/C, Pt-Rh/C, Pt-SnO 2 /C and Pt-Rh-SnO 2 /C, starts at much lower potentials than on Pt/C (E = 0.8 V vs. RHE).…”
Section: Physical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More specifically, the ECSA from Pt-SnO 2 /C and Pt-Rh-SnO 2 /C may be underestimated (and thus d Elec overestimated) due to CO ad electrooxidation probably occurring during the chronoamperometry at E ad = 0.15 V vs. RHE preceding the CV. 53,54 On the one hand, the oxide region on Rh-and Sn-based electrocatalysts, i.e. on Rh/C, Pt-Rh/C, Pt-SnO 2 /C and Pt-Rh-SnO 2 /C, starts at much lower potentials than on Pt/C (E = 0.8 V vs. RHE).…”
Section: Physical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 presents cyclic voltammograms of the supporting electrolyte (0.5 M H 2 SO 4 ) on Pt/C, Rh/C, Pt-Rh/C, Pt-SnO 2 /C and Pt-Rh-SnO 2 /C. The usual features of the so-called hydrogen and oxygen regions of Pt-based electrodes can be observed 53,54. On the one hand, the oxide region on Rh-and Sn-based electrocatalysts, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers have studied the nature of this peak. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] The peak appears aer the platinum electrode has been oxidized at sufficiently high potential or when the platinum electrode has been contact with a sufficiently high hydrogen (H 2 ) concentration, and the oxidation of the species involved in the peak is slow and irreversible compared to the other peaks in the hydrogen region. There appears to be a lack of consensus in the literature as to whether the peak involves the formation of some kind of subsurface hydrogen, or whether it is purely surface conned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,23,24 This peak in current appears near 0.22 V RHE , between peaks corresponding to the exchange of adsorbed hydrogen with hydroxide and water on (110) and on (100) step sites (hence the name “third-peak”), in cyclic voltammograms measured on polycrystalline or single-crystalline platinum electrodes after these electrodes are held at high potential (above ∼1.3 V RHE ) 2328 or low potential (below 0.17 V RHE ). 2325,29 It has been suggested to be due to the formation of a unique surface or subsurface binding site by oxygen (hydrogen) adsorption at high (low) potentials that is then filled by hydrogen at low potentials, 24,26,28 or formed at low potentials by the absorption/desorption of subsurface atomic hydrogen 30,31 or subsurface molecular hydrogen. 27 Work performed with single-crystal electrodes has shown that the third peak is exclusively related to the presence of (110) step sites, (110) terraces, or (110)-(2 × 1) domains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%