2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-17592012000200006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudo das limitações impostas ao amortecimento de oscilações eletromecânicas pelos zeros da FTMA de controladores suplementares

Abstract: O principal objetivo deste trabalho é analisar a influência de diferentes sinais de entrada para controladores suplementares de amortecimento (POD - Power Oscillation Damping) na localização e controle de dispositivos FACTS UPFC (Unified Power Flow Controller), visando o amortecimento de oscilações de baixa frequência no Sistema Elétrico de Potência (SEP). Serão analisados três sinais de entrada, sendo dois sinais localmente disponíveis (corrente elétrica e fluxo de potência ativa na linha de instalação do UPF… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the locations where the control devices will be installed need to be defined, and then, the parameters of the damping controllers should be tuned using the PSO method. Participation factors are used to define the location of the PSS devices in the power system (Kundur 1994) and the difference between the poles and zeros of the POD open-loop transfer function to define the position of the TCSC-POD controller (Moura et al 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the locations where the control devices will be installed need to be defined, and then, the parameters of the damping controllers should be tuned using the PSO method. Participation factors are used to define the location of the PSS devices in the power system (Kundur 1994) and the difference between the poles and zeros of the POD open-loop transfer function to define the position of the TCSC-POD controller (Moura et al 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From additional simulations not shown in this work, the factors of interest were calculated, and it was found that Generators 1, 5 and 9 (G1, G5 and G9) are more influential in local Modes 1, 5 and 8. Analyzing the open-loop transfer function of the POD controller, the transmission line between Buses 30 and 31 (transmission line 30-31) has a greater distance between the pole of interest and its respective zero, which implies a better performance range for the POD controller (Moura et al 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this, it is proposed to install a controller for each oscillatory mode, eight PSSs (local modes) and one TCSC-POD (inter-area mode) with the aim of ensuring small-signal stability and increasing the damping of all modes to desired levels. Simulations not presented in this work were performed to determine the best location for the controllers, and it was considered the participation factors for the PSSs (Kundur 1994) and the open-loop transfer function (OLTF) for the POD (Moura et al 2012). Generators G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, G7, G8 and G9 were identified as the best locations to install the PSSs.…”
Section: Dynamic Analysis Of the Test Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The representation in the time domain of a multi-machine EPS -composed of ng generators and nb buses -modeled by the CSM is given by (1)- (4). More detailed information about (1)-(4) can be found in [28].…”
Section: Current Sensitivity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PSSs are not efficient to provide additional damping to inter-area mode oscillations. On the contrary, depending on the adjustments the effect may be the opposite of what is desired, thereby contributing to the instability of the EPS [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%