2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-17592005000400004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved H2 and H<FONT FACE=Symbol>¥</FONT> conditions for robust analysis and control synthesis of linear systems

Abstract: This paper proposes improved H-2 and H-infinity conditions for continuous-time linear systems with polytopic uncertainties based on a recent result for the discrete-time case. Basically, the performance conditions are built on an augmented-space with additional multipliers resulting in a decoupling between the Lyapunov and system matrices. This nice property is used to develop new conditions for the robust stability, performance analysis, and control synthesis of linear systems using parameter dependent Lyapun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that a direct application of the Elimination Lemma to the parameter‐dependent matrix inequality provides a synthesis condition based on LMIs parameterized in terms of a scalar parameter that belongs to an unbounded domain. () However, to provide parameterized LMI conditions with a search on a scalar parameter that belongs to a bounded domain, analogous to the discrete‐time case,() the change of variables (similar to those in the work of Trofino et al) given by rightA˜cl(α)left:=εAcl(α)I/(2ε),rightrightA^cl(α)left:=εAcl(α)+I/(2ε),rightB¯1(α)left:=εB1(α),rightC¯cl(α)left:=εCcl(α), with ε≠0, is introduced so that inequality becomes []arrayA^cl(α)W(α)A^cl(α)normalTA˜cl(α)W(α)A˜cl(…”
Section: Robust State Feedback Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It should be noted that a direct application of the Elimination Lemma to the parameter‐dependent matrix inequality provides a synthesis condition based on LMIs parameterized in terms of a scalar parameter that belongs to an unbounded domain. () However, to provide parameterized LMI conditions with a search on a scalar parameter that belongs to a bounded domain, analogous to the discrete‐time case,() the change of variables (similar to those in the work of Trofino et al) given by rightA˜cl(α)left:=εAcl(α)I/(2ε),rightrightA^cl(α)left:=εAcl(α)+I/(2ε),rightB¯1(α)left:=εB1(α),rightC¯cl(α)left:=εCcl(α), with ε≠0, is introduced so that inequality becomes []arrayA^cl(α)W(α)A^cl(α)normalTA˜cl(α)W(α)A˜cl(…”
Section: Robust State Feedback Control Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that a direct application of the Elimination Lemma to the parameter-dependent matrix inequality (7) provides a synthesis condition based on LMIs parameterized in terms of a scalar parameter that belongs to an unbounded domain. 21,22 However, to provide parameterized LMI conditions with a search on a scalar parameter that belongs to a bounded domain, analogous to the discrete-time case, 13,23 the change of variables (similar to those in the work of Trofino et al 24 ) given byÃ…”
Section: Lemma 3 (Elimination Lemma)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Statistical numerical comparisons among the main available methods can be found in [20] for continuous-time systems and in [14] for discrete-time systems. Regarding the extensions of the stabilization conditions to cope with performance criteria based on the H 2 and H ∞ norms, in general they present the same sources of conservativeness that affect the stabilization conditions [16,17,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%