2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502013001200008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filling of extraction sockets of feline maxillary canine teeth with autogenous bone or bioactive glass

Abstract: PURPOSE:To evaluate bone healing in the extraction socket of the feline maxillary canine tooth after grafting. METHODS:Eighteen adult cats were submitted to unilateral extraction of maxillary canine tooth and divided into three groups.In group 1 (n=6), control, the extraction socket was left empty. In group 2 (n=6), the extraction socket was filled with autogenous cancellous bone from the iliac crest and in group 3 (n=6), with bioactive glass particulate material. Cats were euthanized at four weeks postoperati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Normally, the process of alveolar socket healing has been initiated once the dental extraction was performed [45,46], and the phase of bone healing in this area has been the same as the other bone healing processes, including the hematoma inflammation phase, repair phase, and remodeling phase. The evaluation of alveolar socket radiodensity under radiography is one of the common techniques used to practically assess alveolar bone healing in the clinical field [37,47]. A study in human dentistry reported that the radiodensity of new bone formation in the socket began to increase at 38 days, and increased until the radiodensity was equal to the bone surrounding the socket at the 105th day or 3 months after extraction [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Normally, the process of alveolar socket healing has been initiated once the dental extraction was performed [45,46], and the phase of bone healing in this area has been the same as the other bone healing processes, including the hematoma inflammation phase, repair phase, and remodeling phase. The evaluation of alveolar socket radiodensity under radiography is one of the common techniques used to practically assess alveolar bone healing in the clinical field [37,47]. A study in human dentistry reported that the radiodensity of new bone formation in the socket began to increase at 38 days, and increased until the radiodensity was equal to the bone surrounding the socket at the 105th day or 3 months after extraction [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiographic findings of postextraction socket preservation in the weeks of the follow-up were described. Moreover, these criteria, which were adapted from previous studies [36][37][38], and which included characteristics of the surgical site margin, as seen in Figure 2 (Criteria A), and characteristics of alveolar new bone formation, as seen in Figure 3 (Criteria B), were applied for post-extraction socket grading. Two of the three examiners had to agree before each socket grade was accepted in order to prevent bias from radiographic evaluation.…”
Section: Radiographic Evaluation and Gradingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Autogenous bone (cancellous bone and cortical bone chips) as well as allograft- based (demineralized bone of the same species) and ceramic-based (calcium phosphate, calcium sulfate and bioglass) bone graft substitutes are most commonly used in veterinary dentistry, although they are not routinely needed in extraction sites. 12,13 Gauze swabs (size 3 x 3 inches, 7.5 x 7.5 cm) allow digital control of hemorrhage during tooth extraction procedures. Lavage with refrigerated lactated Ringer ‘s solution may also provide good hemostasis.…”
Section: Equipment Instruments and Materials For Tooth Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7] However, each of these has its limitations, including problems of supply, complex operational procedures, the risk of crosscontamination, and high costs. 8,9,4 Furthermore, there are no clear guidelines supported by scientific evidence to indicate the type of biomaterial that should be used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%