2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502011000300009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anesthetic recovery and hemodynamic effects of continuous thiopental infusion versus halothane for maintenance anesthesia in patients undergoing ocular surgery

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate anesthesia recovery and hemodynamic status in patients under thiopental infusion or halothane maintenance anesthesia undergoing ocular surgery. METHODS: Fifty-nine voluntary patients undergoing ocular surgery in Farabi hospital were allocated to one of two maintenance anesthesia groups: inhaled halothane, 0.8 to 1 per cent, (group I, n=37) and thiopental infusion, 10 to 12 mg/kg/hour, (group II, n=22). Hemodynamic parameters were recorded at the time of patient entrance to the operation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the recent times, inhalational induction is made popular with sevoflurane or halothane depending on the availability of the agent. [6][7][8][9] Ideal inhalational induction agent should have minimal respiratory irritation, negligible pungency, low blood gas solubility and easily available. Halothane with its negligible pungency and minimal effects on airway reactivity has been the corner stone of paediatric inhalational induction despite its propensity to cause bradycardia, hypotension and arrhythmias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent times, inhalational induction is made popular with sevoflurane or halothane depending on the availability of the agent. [6][7][8][9] Ideal inhalational induction agent should have minimal respiratory irritation, negligible pungency, low blood gas solubility and easily available. Halothane with its negligible pungency and minimal effects on airway reactivity has been the corner stone of paediatric inhalational induction despite its propensity to cause bradycardia, hypotension and arrhythmias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%