2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502005000500012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical esophagostomy using indwelling catheter for analysis of gastric physiology in dogs

Abstract: Purpose:To describe the technique of cervical esophagostomy with indwelling catheter for the collection of secretions and study of gastric emptying. Methods: Esophagostomy was performed in 14 dogs, and a tube was introduced into the animals' stomachs and maintained pervious for eight weeks. The technique consisted of opening the left lateral surface of the neck for insertion of the tube, with the aid of a Mixter forceps, and the subsequent subcutaneous tunneling and exteriorization of the catheter on the dorsu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple samplings from the rumen rather than the single sampling used in this study may have shown effects of aflatoxin on ruminal fermentation. That approach would require cannulated animals, which could increase the risk of toxin contamination, or would require repeated stomach tubing or rumenocentesis, which could stress the cow (Cavalcanti et al, 2005) and perhaps modify the microbiome. The lack of a treatment effect on measured ruminal fermentation indices suggests that the increases in milk yield in our companion study (Jiang et al, 2018) may have been mediated by factors that were not measured, such as ruminal microbial protein synthesis, or postruminal effects, such as increased nutrient supply to the duodenum.…”
Section: Rumen Fermentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple samplings from the rumen rather than the single sampling used in this study may have shown effects of aflatoxin on ruminal fermentation. That approach would require cannulated animals, which could increase the risk of toxin contamination, or would require repeated stomach tubing or rumenocentesis, which could stress the cow (Cavalcanti et al, 2005) and perhaps modify the microbiome. The lack of a treatment effect on measured ruminal fermentation indices suggests that the increases in milk yield in our companion study (Jiang et al, 2018) may have been mediated by factors that were not measured, such as ruminal microbial protein synthesis, or postruminal effects, such as increased nutrient supply to the duodenum.…”
Section: Rumen Fermentationmentioning
confidence: 99%