2002
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502002000900026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alterações cronológicas do perfil dos pacientes e da modalidade de tratamento cirúrgico do megaesôfago chagásico

Abstract: OBJETIVO: Analisar eventuais mudanças no perfil de pacientes com megaesôfago chagásico e na escolha da modalidade de tratamento cirúrgico, mediante estudo comparativo de dois grupos de pacientes em períodos diferentes. MÉTODOS: Foram analisadas duas séries consecutivas de pacientes com megaesôfago chagásico tratados cirurgicamente em dois períodos de tempo: de 1955 a 1962 (n = 147) e de 1988 a 1998 (n = 100). A idade, a duração da disfagia e o estádio evolutivo da doença foram correlacionados com o tipo de cir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In an epidemiological series of a general population sample, rather than a hospital sample, Castro et al 16 also noted a prevalence of Group I and II (80.5%) patients with CM. Ceneviva et al 17 compared 2 epidemiological series and found a greater prevalence of Group III patients in a series from the 1960s and Group II patients in a series from the 1990s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an epidemiological series of a general population sample, rather than a hospital sample, Castro et al 16 also noted a prevalence of Group I and II (80.5%) patients with CM. Ceneviva et al 17 compared 2 epidemiological series and found a greater prevalence of Group III patients in a series from the 1960s and Group II patients in a series from the 1990s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existem diversas classificações para o grau de megaesôfago, mas será adotada a de Mascarenhas 11 que se baseia, fundamentalmente, no diâmetro transverso do órgão, a saber: grau I-até 4cm, grau II-de 4 a 7cm, grau III-7 a 10cm, grau IV-mais de 10cm 11 . Essa classificação é importante para adequar o tratamento, por procedimento cirúrgico, com resultados mais eficientes, menor morbidade e melhor qualidade de vida 3 .…”
unclassified
“…The radiological findings of IEA are similar to those of chagasic megaesophagus, but more advanced forms have been found in greater prevalence in the latter 2 , 9 , 16 , 19 . Although there is no statistical significance because the studied sample was not so relevant, the data served to confirm, because there was the predominance of the non-advanced forms present in 68,7% of the patients in the present series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%