The Frailties of Lebanese Democracy: Outcomes and Limits of the Confessional Framework

Abstract

Lebanon is frequently referred to as a model of a plural and stable democracy in the Middle East: a multi-ethnic and pluri-religious society that guarantees political representation through a power-sharing confessional framework. Numerous authors also see the consociational model as the best democratic alternative given such a high degree of domestic heterogeneity. However, by emphasising Lebanese stability vis-à-vis a troubled regional scenario, these positive perceptions have neglected some elements of how democracy actually works in Lebanon. In this article, I analyse two domestic dimensions that hinder the success of the Lebanese democratic experience (the pre-attribution of seats and distortions of representation) and point to the limits, effects and consequences of consociationalism in this specific confessional reality. The results of this case study indicate that highly institutionalised consociational arrangements can lead to sectarianism, institutional instability, clientelism, and state frailty. I also lay out some lessons and implications that can be derived from such a framework in terms of harmful sectarian narratives at both the local and regional levels.

Addressing the COVID-19 emergency during the ongoing political and economic crisis in Fragile Lebanon: a call to action

“…In addition, the political system struggles with another never-ending deadlock which blocks the creation of a government to initiate a set of reforms that the international community requires as a pre-requisite for channeling aid and support. The reasons behind this challenging situation include a political system, which is based on power-sharing between different religious denominations that distorted the relationship between the state and its "citizens" to clientelist approaches [3]. The country witnessed a civil war between 1975 and 1990 given its critical geopolitical position in the Middle East as well as several political deadlocks and security problems that exacerbated after 2005, the year when the Syrian troops withdrew from Lebanon [1,2].…”

Towards a structural understanding of powerbrokers in weak states: From militias to alliances

“…The millet system turned feudal elites from landowners to sectarian community leaders. Calfat (2018) reports that:…”

Modeling Social Media Effects on Political Distrust in Lebanon

“…This has affected not only Lebanese society but also some countries abroad. Also, the social and cultural contexts of Lebanese society are such that it has different religions and ethnicities (Calfat, 2018). The existence of these ethnicreligious social divisions in this country has caused the social and political atmosphere of this country to be somewhat different from other countries in the Middle East, so that the results of research in other countries in the region may not be generalized to this country.…”