2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-76382006000300004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artéria radial versus veia safena para revascularização do miocárdio: metanálise (não houve diferença estatisticamente significante)

Abstract: Artéria radial versus veia safena para revascularização do miocárdio: metanálise (não houve diferença estatisticamente significante)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, in 2004, Khot et al [8] showed reduced graft patency of RA when compared to ITA and SV grafts. In 2006, Locali et al [9] performed a meta-analysis that showed no statistical difference in graft patency of the RA compared with SV grafts. They point out that all the studies analyzed showed bias, therefore, not allowing a definitive conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, in 2004, Khot et al [8] showed reduced graft patency of RA when compared to ITA and SV grafts. In 2006, Locali et al [9] performed a meta-analysis that showed no statistical difference in graft patency of the RA compared with SV grafts. They point out that all the studies analyzed showed bias, therefore, not allowing a definitive conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radial artery (RA) appeared as a good option, but there is still no proof of its superiority over the SV [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors demonstrate 100% patency in one year [9], other authors report worse results than using the saphenous vein, with 51% over less than two years [47]. Recently, a metanalysis comparing the radial artery with the saphenous vein graft was not able to find differences between the grafts [48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radial artery is an artery muscle spasm and susceptible to atrophy, especially when used to revascularize the coronary arteries without severe stenosis [39,40]. It is noteworthy that the angiographic results of radial artery grafts are not superior to that of GSV grafts [41]. Obtaining gastroepiploic artery, in turn, brings the disadvantage of opening of the peritoneal cavity, and similarly to the radial artery, it is prone to spasm and thus it is only used for the revascularization of severe stenosed arteries [42].…”
Section: Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%