2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-76382004000100005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeito do azul de metileno na resposta inflamatória e hemodinâmica em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica com circulação extracorpórea

Abstract: Methylene blue use in coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective randomized study of the hemodynamic and inflammatory responses Efeito do azul de metileno na resposta inflamatória e hemodinâmica em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica com circulação extracorpórea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the 60 papers that appear in the bibliography of this text, through a laborious and error subjected evaluation, the existence of varied types of publications is evidenced: 1) a first series (1.67%) of six non-randomized patients [5]; 2) a series (1.67%) of 60 patients submitted the CPB and randomized to study the inflammatory reaction [12]; 3) a series (1.67%) of 54 non-randomized patients [6,7]; 4) a series (1.67%) of 56 randomized patients in which 28 had received MB to treat VS in cardiac surgery´s postoperative [8][9][10] and; 5) a series (1.67%) of 100 patients with VS risk factors that had been randomized and 50 patients that received MB before the CPB [11]. Observing the other 55 studies we can find: 1) one study (1.67%) based on evidences through metanalysis of literature [13]; 2) seven review articles (11.67%) [4,14,23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 60 papers that appear in the bibliography of this text, through a laborious and error subjected evaluation, the existence of varied types of publications is evidenced: 1) a first series (1.67%) of six non-randomized patients [5]; 2) a series (1.67%) of 60 patients submitted the CPB and randomized to study the inflammatory reaction [12]; 3) a series (1.67%) of 54 non-randomized patients [6,7]; 4) a series (1.67%) of 56 randomized patients in which 28 had received MB to treat VS in cardiac surgery´s postoperative [8][9][10] and; 5) a series (1.67%) of 100 patients with VS risk factors that had been randomized and 50 patients that received MB before the CPB [11]. Observing the other 55 studies we can find: 1) one study (1.67%) based on evidences through metanalysis of literature [13]; 2) seven review articles (11.67%) [4,14,23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ohri et al [16] have shown that changes in thyroid hormone levels are likely to detect the immediate postoperative period, since at this stage, there is an active state of catabolism associated with high rates of oxygen consumption [17][18][19][20]. Some authors have postulated that the decrease in thyroid hormones in the post-CPB favors the occurrence of global myocardial dysfunction and arrhythmias, especially atrial fibrillation [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Fig 3 -Comparison Between Two Moments For Total T3 Free T3mentioning
confidence: 99%