Qual o melhor questionário para avaliar os aspectos físicos de pacientes com osteoartrite no joelho na população brasileira?

Metsavaht, Leonardo; Leporace, Gustavo; Sposito, Marilia Pontes; Riberto, Marcelo; Batista, Luiz Alberto

doi:10.1590/s0102-36162011000300004

Cited by 18 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 12 publications

(19 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The Lysholm 26 , 33 questionnaire showed a level below suggested, which may indicate a lack of correlation between questions. However, WOMAC, 33 34 . Scale Activities of Daily Living (ADLS-KOS) 25 and KSS 27 had values above 0.95, which may suggest that there is a certain degree of redundancy among questions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…After the searches, a total of 868 titles was retrieved, of which 15 articles presented the eligibility criteria adopted and were included in the present review. 19 - 33 ( Figure 1 ) One study was included after manual search since it was a dissertation that had as a purpose of translating and validating the questionnaire Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). 34 In total, 16 studies were analyzed and provided the translation of 15 questionnaires, since one of the included articles presented only validation data from already translated questionnaires.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Functionality 20 questions. Score between 0 and 80 (0 = worst condition; 100 = best condition) 87 Osteoarthritis, ACL injury, meniscal injury, tendinopathy, arthroplasty, patellar fracture, PCL injury and chronic laxity Metsavaht et al 33 WOMAC Lysholm IKDC Already presented Already presented 57 Osteoarthritis Portuguese from Portugal Gonçalves et al 19 KOS-ADLS Nonspecific. Symptoms and function in activities of daily living 17 questions.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Traduções para a língua portuguesa de questionários que avaliam lesões de joelho

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this systematic review was to review the quality of the translation and the measurement properties from questionnaires that assess injuries of the knee. We included questionnaires that were developed in foreign language and have been translated and validated into Portuguese. The databases used were CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, LILACS, PUBMED and SCIELO and the final search resulted in a total of 868 studies included, from which 16 were eligible. Most included questionnaires presented all steps expected in a translation process; however there were some deficiencies in measurement properties among the questionnaires. The VISA-P Brazil was the best questionnaire when analyzing translation process and measurement properties tested. It was the only questionnaire that tested all measurement properties investigated and presented adequate values for all of them. KOS-ADLS was the best questionnaire translated to Portuguese from Portugal. Among all, the VISA-P Brazil is the best questionnaire to be used with Brazilian Portuguese speakers when the condition is related to patellar tendinopathy and the LEFS is the best questionnaire for other general conditions of the knee. For Portuguese from Portugal, the best questionnaire is the KOS-ADLS, and like the LEFS it does not target any specific injury.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Traduções para a língua portuguesa de questionários que avaliam lesões de joelho

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…When comparing the fixation of meniscal root through anchors vs. the pull-out technique, Kim et al 42 found no significant differences in the IKDC, 57 , 58 Lysholm, and HSS scores, as well as in the degree of articular degeneration between the two groups.…”

Section: Assessment Of Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding posterior meniscal roots lesions: from basic science to treatment

Cruz

Ferrari

Metsavaht³

et al. 2017

Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The variability of symptoms and the fact that they are not easily recognized in imaging studies make the diagnosis and treatment of posterior meniscal roots lesions a challenging task to the orthopedist. In recent years, a more precise understanding of the anatomy and biomechanical impair of the knee joint in these cases has enabled great advances in therapeutic approaches. Well-documented studies have shown that the repair of these lesions presents superior functional and clinical improvement when compared with meniscectomy. However, the progression of degenerative joint changes in the long-term still exhibits conflicting results.

show abstract

“…Além disso, evidenciou-se uma associação dos portadores da SDFP com o desenvolvimento de osteoartrite patelofemoral (UTTING et al, 2005). Segundo a Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS) a osteoartrite no joelho é a quarta principal causa de incapacidade funcional em mulheres e a oitava em homens (METSAVAHT et al, 2011). A SDFP está ainda associada com o desenvolvimento de patologias de maior grau de limitação funcional como a tendinite peripatelar e bursites (NG et al, 2008).…”

Section: Considerações Sobre a Sdfpunclassified

Caracterização de parâmetros biomecânicos durante a subida de degraus

Kuriki¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Qual o melhor questionário para avaliar os aspectos físicos de pacientes com osteoartrite no joelho na população brasileira?

Cited by 18 publications

References 12 publications

Traduções para a língua portuguesa de questionários que avaliam lesões de joelho

Traduções para a língua portuguesa de questionários que avaliam lesões de joelho

Understanding posterior meniscal roots lesions: from basic science to treatment

Caracterização de parâmetros biomecânicos durante a subida de degraus

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About