Avaliação funcional dos pacientes submetidos ao desbridamento artroscópico para tratamento das rupturas extensas e irreparáveis do manguito rotador

Veado, Marco Antônio de Castro; Rodrigues, Alessandro Ulhôa

doi:10.1590/s0102-36162010000500009

Cited by 9 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the period evaluated, 712 original articles were published in the Brazilian Journal of Orthopedics and 588 in Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, or 1300 publications. Among these, 84 (6.7% of the total) were clinical articles on shoulder diseases; 25 publications (1.9% of the total) 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 evaluated the clinical results of treatment of rotator cuff tears ( Table 1 ); twenty studies (80%) were case series (level of evidence IV), one (4%) case–control study (level of evidence III) and four (16%) cohorts (level of evidence II). No randomized study was published in the period.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?

Assunção

Malavolta

Domingues

et al. 2017

Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review evaluated the outcomes used in clinical studies involving rotator cuff tear published in the last decade in the two leading Brazilian orthopedic journals. A literature review was performed using the journals Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia and Acta Ortopédica Brasileira. It included all original clinical articles describing at least one outcome measured before or after any clinical or surgical intervention related to rotator cuff tear, published between 2006 and 2015. The authors evaluated range of motion, muscle strength, patient satisfaction, and tendon integrity and functional outcomes scores. There were 25 clinical studies published about rotator cuff in the two principal Brazilian orthopedic journals in the last decade, 20 case series (80%), one case–control (4%), and four cohorts (16%). Objective measures such as muscle strength, patient satisfaction, and evaluation of tendon integrity were little used. Range of motion measurements were performed in 52% of the articles. Evaluations of muscle strength and patient satisfaction were reported by 28% and 16% of the studies, respectively. Only 28% of the articles evaluated tendon integrity after surgery. Of these, 16% did so by magnetic resonance imaging and 12% by ultrasonography. The most used scale was the UCLA, present in 92% of the articles, while the Constant–Murley appeared in 20%. Scales deemed reliable, with high internal consistency and good responsiveness, were rarely used.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?

Assunção

Malavolta

Domingues

et al. 2017

Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Maynou et al 13 noticed complaint to the asymmetry of the UL in only 5% of their patients. Veado et al 30 showed no complaints regarding aesthetic deformity of UL in LHB tenotomized patients with irreparable injuries of the UL. The perception and concern about aesthetic deformities may vary according to socioeconomic, environmental, cultural, and professional and physical activities.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Interprofessional analysis of esthetical deformity from long head biceps tenotomy

Almeida¹,

Valin²,

Lotti³

et al. 2015

Acta ortop. bras.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perception of an esthetical deformity resultant from arthroscopic long head biceps (LHB) tenotomy according to the degree of experience of the assisting professional. METHODS: 120 patients submitted to shoulder surgery were photographed and photos were mounted in a PowerPoint presentation. Three shoulder specialist surgeons, three generalist orthopedic surgeons and three graduated residents analyzed the presentation. RESULTS: On all patients we observed most agreement among the shoulder specialists. When just the patients with LHB tenotomy were analyzed, the specialists agreed moderately, the generalists had small agreement and the residents, a poor one. Analyzing patients with BMI < 30, there was major agreement between the specialists, while the generalists and residents had poor agreement. Analyzing patients with BMI ≥ 30, the generalists had small kappa agreement, while the specialists and residents had no agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The perception of an esthetical deformity regarding a LHB tenotomy did not have significant agreement between different level of professionals, even though the specialists showed similar perception on tenotomy patients. The evaluation of obese patients lowered the agreement on the three groups of professionals. Level of Evidence III. Case Control Study.

show abstract

Treatment of Massive Irreparable Cuff Tears: Decision Making Process

Scaini

Salvi

Milano

2020

Massive and Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Avaliação funcional dos pacientes submetidos ao desbridamento artroscópico para tratamento das rupturas extensas e irreparáveis do manguito rotador

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?

Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?

Interprofessional analysis of esthetical deformity from long head biceps tenotomy

Treatment of Massive Irreparable Cuff Tears: Decision Making Process

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About