2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-33062011000100010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flora ficológica da região sublitorânea rasa de costões rochosos do Núcleo Picinguaba, Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar, Ubatuba, São Paulo

Abstract: Em unidades de conservação da zona costeira, o conhecimento das macroalgas marinhas é essencial para monitoramento e manejo. Para o Núcleo Picinguaba do Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar (PESM), Ubatuba, norte do Estado de São Paulo, estudos pretéritos realizados na Enseada da Fazenda listam espécies de macroalgas, coletadas em costões rochosos e manguezais. O presente estudo visou complementar o levantamento taxonômico da flora ficológica marinha do Núcleo Picinguaba, avaliando também a adequação da metodologia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The macroalgal species composition of the shallow subtidal habitat of the islands is similar in some respects to those observed in other surveys previously conducted in Ilha Grande Bay (FALCÃO et al, 1992;PEDRINI et al, 1994;GESTINARI et al, 1998;BRITO et al, 2002;NASSAR, 2005;TÂMEGA, 2007) and in other locations along the coasts of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo States PAULA, 2000a;AMADO FILHO et al, 2003, 2006MACHADO et al, 2011). In those locations, the most representative order by number of species was Ceramiales, and the most frequent species were H. spinella, A. taxiformis, D. delicatula and J. adhaerens, typically associated with Sargassum beds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The macroalgal species composition of the shallow subtidal habitat of the islands is similar in some respects to those observed in other surveys previously conducted in Ilha Grande Bay (FALCÃO et al, 1992;PEDRINI et al, 1994;GESTINARI et al, 1998;BRITO et al, 2002;NASSAR, 2005;TÂMEGA, 2007) and in other locations along the coasts of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo States PAULA, 2000a;AMADO FILHO et al, 2003, 2006MACHADO et al, 2011). In those locations, the most representative order by number of species was Ceramiales, and the most frequent species were H. spinella, A. taxiformis, D. delicatula and J. adhaerens, typically associated with Sargassum beds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Macroalgal diversity has been among the most important considerations in the establishment, management and monitoring of Brazilian marine protected areas (OLIVEIRA FILHO;UGADIM, 1976;SZÉCHY et al, 1989;FALCÃO et al, 1992;FIGUEIREDO et al, 2004;AMADO FILHO et al, 2006;HORTA et al, 2008;MACHADO et al, 2011). In Brazil, protected areas are defined as territorial spaces with relevant natural features, including jurisdictional waters, which are legally established by government authorities under special regulation and must be appropriately protected by environmental agencies (Law no 9.985;BRASIL, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sampling was conducted at three shores located along the coast of Ubatuba in the state of São Paulo, SE Brazil (Figure 1): Fortaleza (23°31′55″S 45°09′45″W; May 2008 and December 2016), Grande (23°28′01″S 45°03′36″W; June 2012 and December 2016) and Fazenda (23°21′27″S 44°51′57″W; July 2010, November 2011, July 2013 and March 2016). Gathering information from previous studies and wave fetch (km) estimated from an area of 0.64 km 2 centred in each shore coordinate (following Burrows et al ., 2008), we were able to classify each shore regarding the wave exposure regime: Fortaleza is the most sheltered shore among the three sites studied here (Paula & Oliveira-Filho, 1982; Széchy & Paula, 2000; wave fetch: 3.1 ± 0,6); Grande is a wider shore (~15 m between upper and lower intertidal limits) exposed to intense wave impacts (Tanaka et al ., 2002; wave fetch: 4.9 ± 0.6); and Fazenda is also a more exposed shore (Machado et al ., 2011; wave fetch: 3.7 ± 0.2), but a narrower one when compared with Grande (~5 m between upper and lower intertidal limits). The three shores are composed of rocky boulders and bed rocks over sandy substratum.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%