2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2013000500005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods and logistics of a multidisciplinary survey of schoolchildren from Pelotas, in the Southern Region of Brazil

Abstract: This paper describes the methods of a multidisciplinary epidemiological survey conducted in schools in Pelotas, in the Southern Region of Brazil. This cross-sectional study evaluated a representative sample (n = 1,211) of eight to 12-year-old children attending public (15) and private (5) schools. Questionnaires were applied to parents to obtain information about socioeconomic and sociocultural characteristics. Children were interviewed to provide information on demographic characteristics, oral health behavio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the examiners and interviewers were trained, and the oral conditions were calibrated according to previously described methodology. 16 Examiner reliability was calculated using weighted kappa tests and intraclass correlation coefficients when appropriate. The mean kappa value was 0.83 for dental caries.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the examiners and interviewers were trained, and the oral conditions were calibrated according to previously described methodology. 16 Examiner reliability was calculated using weighted kappa tests and intraclass correlation coefficients when appropriate. The mean kappa value was 0.83 for dental caries.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each school, all children aged 8-12 years in grades 2-6 were invited to participate. Detailed information on the methodology of this survey has been reported elsewhere (20).…”
Section: Population and Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this was a multi-disciplinary study 7 with different oral health outcomes being studied, the different prevalences of oral health problems reported in the literature were considered when calculating the sample. The minimum sample necessary (n = 922) was obtained using the following estimates and parameters: estimated prevalence of the health problem 10.0%, acceptable error of three percentage points, 95% confidence interval, extra 20.0% to cover losses and refusals, and design effect estimated at 2.0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%