2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2009000100016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detección y diferenciación de Entamoeba histolytica y Entamoeba dispar mediante reacción en cadena de la polimerasa en individuos de una comunidad del Estado Zulia, Venezuela

Abstract: La identificación diferencial de Entamoeba histolytica y Entamoeba dispar es esencial para un tratamiento adecuado del paciente y con fines epidemiológicos. Para determinar la prevalencia de E. histolytica y E. dispar se estandarizó y aplicó un ensayo de PCR, utilizando oligonucleótidos específicos para cada especie. 204 muestras de heces de individuos de la comunidad de Santa Rosa de Agua (Municipio Maracaibo, Estado Zulia, Venezuela), fueron analizadas a través del examen directo con SSF (0,85%) y lugol, con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…E. histolytica was found in 7% of the cases and was diagnosed by highly specific PCR, which is able to distinguish between E. histolytica and the pathogen forms E. dispar/moshkovskii [ 21 , 22 ]. Compared to studies performed in rural areas of Venezuela [ 23 ] and Mexico [ 24 ], where a prevalence of 11% and 14% was respectively detected, the occurrence rate among the Wiwas seems to be lower. The different diagnostic techniques applied (microscopy and different PCRs) might have affected these findings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…E. histolytica was found in 7% of the cases and was diagnosed by highly specific PCR, which is able to distinguish between E. histolytica and the pathogen forms E. dispar/moshkovskii [ 21 , 22 ]. Compared to studies performed in rural areas of Venezuela [ 23 ] and Mexico [ 24 ], where a prevalence of 11% and 14% was respectively detected, the occurrence rate among the Wiwas seems to be lower. The different diagnostic techniques applied (microscopy and different PCRs) might have affected these findings.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Otra porción se congeló a -20 °C, hasta su procesamiento por técnicas de biología molecular, en las que se hicieron la extracción de ADN, su purificación y luego la amplificación mediante reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR) en forma separada para E. histolytica y E. dispar, según procedimiento de Rivero, et al (13).…”
Section: Materiales Y Métodosunclassified
“…histolytica is more frequent than E . dispar [ 22 , 23 , 24 ]. In Colombia there is no data (by molecular methods) on the prevalence of these three amoebas in humans and also if there exist the presence of E .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%