2001
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2001000700024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Global surveillance of emerging diseases: the ProMED-mail perspective

Abstract: The Internet is changing the way global disease surveillance is conducted. Countries and international organizations are increasingly placing their outbreak reports on the Internet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Certainly any effort to construct a site that would allow for the circulation of pre-validated information should be sensitive to the risks of generating disruptive rumors. Given the existence of sites like ProMed, which was created in 1994 (Mitchell 1997;Woodall 2001), it may be possible to assess such risks before launching a site with the properties discussed here. A less formal approach would be to attempt to reinstate a norm of informal information-sharing among colleagues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly any effort to construct a site that would allow for the circulation of pre-validated information should be sensitive to the risks of generating disruptive rumors. Given the existence of sites like ProMed, which was created in 1994 (Mitchell 1997;Woodall 2001), it may be possible to assess such risks before launching a site with the properties discussed here. A less formal approach would be to attempt to reinstate a norm of informal information-sharing among colleagues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, the IHR made the WHO exceedingly dependent on official country reports by prohibiting the use of other sources of information. Although ProMED‐mail became an important unofficial source of information about threats to public health after its founding in 1994, for many years the WHO was constrained from officially using it (Woodall ) . Over time, the WHO’s stance on these alternative sources of information evolved.…”
Section: Knowledge and Ignorance In Disease Surveillance: The 1969 Ihmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the volume of information available from electronic sources and from health experts dispersed around the world increased, the pressure to use such information also increased. With increasingly sophisticated tracking systems, for instance, it became possible to demonstrate that deaths (even of particular named individuals) could have been prevented by earlier issuance of travelers’ advisories (Woodall ). Often, though, sub rosa information was less useful for issuing official warnings than for pressuring countries to report or for asking pointed questions about the adequacy or accuracy of reported information.…”
Section: Knowledge and Ignorance In Disease Surveillance: The 1969 Ihmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several internet-scanning systems have been developed starting in 1997 with the Global Public Health Intelligence Network -GPHIN [12], and followed by many others such as the World Health Organizations of the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network -WHOGOARN [18], the Program for Monitoring Emerging Diseases from the International Society for Infectious Diseases -ProMED-mail [20], the Health Map system [21], and the Global Health Monitor based on the Bio Caster ontology [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%