1994
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x1994000800012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An epidemiological approach to study congenital Chagas' disease

Abstract: . Transplacental transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi has been the focus of much attention in highly endemic areas in South America. Frequency of congenital transmission and factors associated with risk of it are still not well understood. Parasite strains may account for part of the geographical variation observed. Methodological differences between the studies do not permit a combined interpretation of results. This paper examines the epidemiological data available from Brazil, Bolivia, and Argentina and discus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These variations may be caused by the degree of parasitemia of the infected mother, differing parasite strains, exposure to vector‐borne re‐infections during pregnancy, occurrence of acute form of the disease during pregnancy, different origins of the population studied (Latin American immigrants in non‐endemic countries), maternal age, as well as different diagnostic techniques and study designs (Bittencourt ; Andrade et al . ; Gurtler et al . ; Hermann et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variations may be caused by the degree of parasitemia of the infected mother, differing parasite strains, exposure to vector‐borne re‐infections during pregnancy, occurrence of acute form of the disease during pregnancy, different origins of the population studied (Latin American immigrants in non‐endemic countries), maternal age, as well as different diagnostic techniques and study designs (Bittencourt ; Andrade et al . ; Gurtler et al . ; Hermann et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then numerous articles have been published regarding congenital Chagas disease: epidemiological and clinical studies, evaluation of different diagnostic methods [9], congenital Chagas as an imported disease (cases reported in Spain, USA, Switzerland), and above all, highlighting the importance of the disease in terms of public health and the need for health programs concerned with its diagnosis and treatment in all the endemic countries [7], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. However, the initiatives for control and management of congenital Chagas in endemic countries are far from achieving total geographic coverage [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Such initiatives are not only necessary in endemic countries, but should, in a targeted way, also be implemented in countries that receive or have received significant migration flows from Latin America such as USA, Spain, Switzerland and others [3], [23], [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,6,7 Although much less common in the United States, it has been estimated that more than 300,000 people in the United States may have Chagas disease, 8,9 and congenital transmission occurs in 1-10% of infants born to infected mothers. 10 The majority of Chagas cases in the United States are chronically infected persons who have migrated from endemic areas where they acquired the infection; most are asymptomatic and likely unaware of their infection. 8 However, the detection of asymptomatic infections in the United States has increased after the initiation of widespread screening of the blood supply for T. cruzi in early 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%