1997
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-261x1997000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estruturação da seqüência vulcano-sedimentar Rio Mata Cavalo (Morro do Pilar, MG, Brasil) baseada na análise qualitativa de dados geofísicos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample purportedly identified as belonging to the Pedro Pereira Group yielded a date of (2839 ±14) Ma and the igneous zircon grains from the assumed Costa Sena Group delivered the date of (2049 ±16) Ma. The Alvorada de Minas meta‐ultramafic suite (Almeida‐Abreu et al, ) and the Rio Mata Cavalo metavolcano‐sedimentary sequence (S. A. M. Machado & Penha, and references therein) are developed along the eastern part of the range. Hagedorn, Ebert, and Almeida‐Abreu () published U–Pb zircon dates for the strongly sheared rocks of the Alvorada de Minas Suite with significant variations (2.22–2.05 Ga) among different lithotypes and errors up to 130 Ma, which nevertheless suggest a Paleoproterozoic (Orosirian?)…”
Section: The Orosirian–statherian Iron Formation‐bearing Sequences Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample purportedly identified as belonging to the Pedro Pereira Group yielded a date of (2839 ±14) Ma and the igneous zircon grains from the assumed Costa Sena Group delivered the date of (2049 ±16) Ma. The Alvorada de Minas meta‐ultramafic suite (Almeida‐Abreu et al, ) and the Rio Mata Cavalo metavolcano‐sedimentary sequence (S. A. M. Machado & Penha, and references therein) are developed along the eastern part of the range. Hagedorn, Ebert, and Almeida‐Abreu () published U–Pb zircon dates for the strongly sheared rocks of the Alvorada de Minas Suite with significant variations (2.22–2.05 Ga) among different lithotypes and errors up to 130 Ma, which nevertheless suggest a Paleoproterozoic (Orosirian?)…”
Section: The Orosirian–statherian Iron Formation‐bearing Sequences Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%