1991
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-81751991000100002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dípteros caliptrados (Muscidae e Anthomyiidae) da região metropolitana do Rio de Janeiro, RJ: II. Atratividade e freqüência sazonal

Abstract: ABSTRACT. DIPTERA, CALYPTRATAE (MUSCIDAE E ANfHOMYIIDAE) FROM THE METROPOLITAN AREA OF RIO DE JANEIRO, ru. II. ATRACTIVITY ANO SAZONAL FREQUENCY. Nine thousand, six hundred and ninety-one flies ofthe family Muscidae (47 species) and Anthomyiidae (2 species) were captured. Aies were collected in three ecologically distinct areas (urban, rural and forest) within the metropolitan region of the city of Rio de Janeiro using as baits decomposing fish, bovine liver, fresh human faeces and mashed banana with sugar. Fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to Muscidae, there are a number of inventories in Brazil, but unbalanced between the different Brazilian biomes and states. For example, while there is a voluminous literature on Muscidae for the States of Paraná and Rio de Janeiro (e.g., Carvalho et al, 1984;D'Almeida, 1991;Pamplona et al, 2000;Oliveira et al, 2002;Costacurta et al, 2003;Couri & Carvalho, 2005;Leandro & D'Almeida, 2005;Rodríguez-Fernández et al, 2006;Couri & Barros, 2009), the most rich and populous Brazilian State remains with the Muscidae diversity knowledge still incipient. Furthermore, it is relatively scarce the Muscidae surveys in the Neotropics based on the use of non-baited collecting techniques (e.g., Carvalho & Couri, 1991;Costacurta et al, 2003;Rodríguez-Fernández et al, 2006;Krüger et al, 2010;Zafalon-Silva et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to Muscidae, there are a number of inventories in Brazil, but unbalanced between the different Brazilian biomes and states. For example, while there is a voluminous literature on Muscidae for the States of Paraná and Rio de Janeiro (e.g., Carvalho et al, 1984;D'Almeida, 1991;Pamplona et al, 2000;Oliveira et al, 2002;Costacurta et al, 2003;Couri & Carvalho, 2005;Leandro & D'Almeida, 2005;Rodríguez-Fernández et al, 2006;Couri & Barros, 2009), the most rich and populous Brazilian State remains with the Muscidae diversity knowledge still incipient. Furthermore, it is relatively scarce the Muscidae surveys in the Neotropics based on the use of non-baited collecting techniques (e.g., Carvalho & Couri, 1991;Costacurta et al, 2003;Rodríguez-Fernández et al, 2006;Krüger et al, 2010;Zafalon-Silva et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%