2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-74382012005000019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison between the complete Bayesian method and empirical Bayesian method for ARCH models using Brazilian financial time series

Abstract: ABSTRACT. In this work we compared the estimates of the parameters of ARCH models using a complete Bayesian method and an empirical Bayesian method in which we adopted a non-informative prior distribution and informative prior distribution, respectively. We also considered a reparameterization of those models in order to map the space of the parameters into real space. This procedure permits choosing prior normal distributions for the transformed parameters. The posterior summaries were obtained using Monte Ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to , "forecasts with many steps forward and using the same adjustment model are not recommended". As data are updated, the adjustment model should be revised in order for the forecasts to be more accurate (Oliveira & Andrade, 2012). In this case, one can observe a need for the models to be updated in about six months (from June 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to , "forecasts with many steps forward and using the same adjustment model are not recommended". As data are updated, the adjustment model should be revised in order for the forecasts to be more accurate (Oliveira & Andrade, 2012). In this case, one can observe a need for the models to be updated in about six months (from June 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model with the maximum likelihood is the one that fits the data the best. Then, the best model is the one that has the lowest AIC value (Oliveira & Andrade, 2012).…”
Section: Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (Arima) Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%