2002
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-74382002000200010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the measurement of capacity utilisation and coast efficiency: a non-parametric approach at firm level

Abstract: In this paper we evaluate the inefficiency generated by an inadequate structure of the fixed inputs and by the difficulty to adjust them in the short-run in a sample of Romanian firms in the chemical industry over the period 1996-1997. We use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and apply this methodology in an innovative setting using a cost analysis instead of the technical efficiency approach. The results show inefficiency in most of the cases due to a low degree of capacity utilisation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is simply the ratio between actual production and potential 327 Kenderdine: China's Industrial Policy production in an industrial economy, but it is a supply/demand gauge that allows plants to increase and decrease their productive output relative to potential output to match market price signals (Prior & Filimon 2002). In a socialist planned economy, we can expect full employment and full capacity utilisation at both the firm level and the national aggregate.…”
Section: Industrial Policy Cumulative Causation and Capacity Utilisamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is simply the ratio between actual production and potential 327 Kenderdine: China's Industrial Policy production in an industrial economy, but it is a supply/demand gauge that allows plants to increase and decrease their productive output relative to potential output to match market price signals (Prior & Filimon 2002). In a socialist planned economy, we can expect full employment and full capacity utilisation at both the firm level and the national aggregate.…”
Section: Industrial Policy Cumulative Causation and Capacity Utilisamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest methodologies for this approach include linear interpolation of values between local maximums and interpretation of those values as a potential output, the Wharton Business School Index (Klein and Summers, 1966), a comparison between current output and the output calculated as a ratio of capital and minimum capital-output ratio within a local neighborhood, 3 and a comparison between the average and maximum hours worked and capital used (Taubman and Gottschalk, 1971;Beaulieu and Mattey, 1998). In the framework of this approach, more complex methodologies should be mentioned: the optimal utilization level would occur if either short-term costs areminimized (Klein,1960;Friedman,1963;Hickman,1964;Morrison,1985;Prior and Filimon, 2002;Ray, 2015), short-term output is maximized (Johansen, 1968;Fareetal.,1989;Rayetal.,2006),orprofitismaximized (Coellietal., 2002). Recently, the structural and cyclical components of economic trends have beenisolatedusingfiltersorstructuralvectorautoregressionmethods (Andrle, 2013;Haviketal.,2014;Apokinetal.,2014;BankofRussia,2014;Sinelnikov-Murylev et al, 2014;IMF, 2014), along with econometric analyses of the correlationbetweenchangesinthecoreinflationrateandcapacityutilizationrates (McElhattan,1978;OomesandDynnikova,2006;MironovandKanofiev,2014).…”
Section: International Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the short run, with the given fixed input vector (x f o ), the minimum short-run variable cost C v o ðy; wÞ of firm 'o' to produce y o can be obtained from the following LP (Prior and Filimon, 2002):…”
Section: Economic Measure Of Cumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Berndt and Morrison (1981) for a detailed discussion on how variations in input prices might affect the minimum point of the SRATC and hence Y ** . 19 See, for example, among others, Klein (1960), Berndt and Morrison (1981) and Prior and Filimon (2002) for the details.…”
Section: Economic Measure Of Cumentioning
confidence: 99%