2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-66282012000400005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entre o nacional e o neonacional-desenvolvimentismo: poder político e classes sociais no Brasil contemporâneo

Abstract: Diversos cientistas sociais que se dedicam à difícil tarefa de estudar o governo Lula da Silva têm retomado a reflexão sobre o período desenvolvimentista brasileiro. Neste artigo, examinamos as relações entre poder político, regime político e política de Estado durante: 1) o apogeu e crise final do nacional‑desenvolvimentismo; 2) o neonacional‑desenvolvimentismo. Nosso objetivo é contribuir para a análise de dois importantes momentos do Brasil contemporâneo.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The MST remained politically engaged, but became less effective. To a certain extent, placing more emphasis on the economic-corporate demands of its landed base, which were partly met by public programs, the movement became dependent on Lulism (Almeida 2012)even if there was a sharp understanding and critique of the development model, its logic and corresponding powers among its ranks.…”
Section: The Rural Staging Political Tensions and Appeasementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MST remained politically engaged, but became less effective. To a certain extent, placing more emphasis on the economic-corporate demands of its landed base, which were partly met by public programs, the movement became dependent on Lulism (Almeida 2012)even if there was a sharp understanding and critique of the development model, its logic and corresponding powers among its ranks.…”
Section: The Rural Staging Political Tensions and Appeasementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Críticas a las rotulaciones y análisis superficiales del gobierno Lula (neodesarrollismo, etc.) son presentadas por Castelo (2012), Sampaio Jr. (2012) y Almeida (2012).…”
Section: Intervención Humanitariaunclassified