2001
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-546x2001000100002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seletividade por cor e escolhas conjugais no Brasil dos 90

Abstract: ResumoEste artigo se propõe analisar os padrões de preferências na escolha dos parceiros por grupos raciais, tal como estes grupos são definidos nas pesquisas realizadas pelo IBGE, utilizando as informações fornecidas pelas PNADs de 1995 e 1996. As uniões foram classificadas em dois tipos: endogâmicas e exogâmicas, segundo as categorias de cor dos côn-juges. Na primeira parte do artigo são apresentadas as características gerais da nupcialidade por cor para o total do Brasil e por regiões. Na segunda parte, são… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
12

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
12
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the Brazilian social race identification system based primarily on phenotype, the children with dark skin pigmentation and other African iconic individual components of color would be considered Black, while those with light colored skin and other European iconic individual components of color would be considered White, even though they would have exactly the same proportion of African and European alleles [9]. Since in Brazil there also occurs assortative mating by color (as has indeed been revealed by demographic studies) [22], [23], in the hypothetical subsequent generation, the light-skinned individuals would tend to marry other Whites and conversely the dark-skinned individuals would marry Blacks. The long-term tendency would then be for this pattern to produce two distinct color groups, White and Black, which would, nonetheless, both have simultaneously a significant level of European and African ancestry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the Brazilian social race identification system based primarily on phenotype, the children with dark skin pigmentation and other African iconic individual components of color would be considered Black, while those with light colored skin and other European iconic individual components of color would be considered White, even though they would have exactly the same proportion of African and European alleles [9]. Since in Brazil there also occurs assortative mating by color (as has indeed been revealed by demographic studies) [22], [23], in the hypothetical subsequent generation, the light-skinned individuals would tend to marry other Whites and conversely the dark-skinned individuals would marry Blacks. The long-term tendency would then be for this pattern to produce two distinct color groups, White and Black, which would, nonetheless, both have simultaneously a significant level of European and African ancestry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toward this end, the Brazilian government actually subsidized massive immigration of Europeans at the turn of the century to work on the coffee plantations in the South (Graham 1999). Although the eugenic project has ended, the whitening sentiment continues in Belmonte today and in partner preferences throughout Brazil (Petruccelli 2001).…”
Section: Antiessentialist Messages In Belmontementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars of race relations in Brazil have moved beyond Freyre's US/Brazil exculpatory dialectic and generally accepted that the South American country has its own unique forms of racial inequality and discrimination. When considering interracial marriage specifically, Brazilianist and cosmopolitan‐Americanist scholars emphasize the discrimination in the marriage market against people of African descent and with darker skin colors (Petruccelli 2001; Telles 2004). Telles in particular emphasizes continued discrimination even while acknowledging that the marriage market is far less discriminatory in Brazil than in the US.…”
Section: A Comparative Historical Background On Race Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%