2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-41612004000300004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of family background on crime participation and criminal earnings: an empirical analysis of siblings

Abstract: This study exploits the sibling structure of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth data to measure the degree to which family background explains the variance in the propensity to engage in criminal activities and in the intensity and success of crime participation as measured by the level of criminal earnings. A multiple-equation model whose reduced form disturbances are connected by a common unobservable variable having a variance-components structure is developed and estimated. Estimation results indica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Nearly 20% of the prison population under the age of 30, and 25% of prisoners with prior convictions, report that they spent part of their childhood in foster care. 2 This is not surprising given the strong correlation found between poor family backgrounds and later criminal behavior (Loeber and Stouthamer-Loeber, 1986;Widom, 1989;Case and Katz, 1991;Sampson and Laub, 1993;Donohue andLevitt, 2001, Currie andTekin, 2006;Pezzin, 2004). Meanwhile, interventions for youth at risk for criminal behavior are thought to have some impact and 1 Criminal activity has received considerable attention from economists following Becker (1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Nearly 20% of the prison population under the age of 30, and 25% of prisoners with prior convictions, report that they spent part of their childhood in foster care. 2 This is not surprising given the strong correlation found between poor family backgrounds and later criminal behavior (Loeber and Stouthamer-Loeber, 1986;Widom, 1989;Case and Katz, 1991;Sampson and Laub, 1993;Donohue andLevitt, 2001, Currie andTekin, 2006;Pezzin, 2004). Meanwhile, interventions for youth at risk for criminal behavior are thought to have some impact and 1 Criminal activity has received considerable attention from economists following Becker (1968).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%