2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-20612013000400026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of the PetrifilmTM and TEMPO® systems and the conventional method for counting microorganisms in pasteurized milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite delivering high-throughput analysis (100 enumerations/hour), sensitivity may not be suitable for all kinds of microbiological analysis (detection range: 10 2 -10 8 CFU/g) (BioMérieux 2018). Such an instrument ensures considerable time and labor saving, performing well in food analysis in comparison with standard methods (Owen, Willis, and Lamph 2010;Paulsen et al 2008), but poor accuracy compared to plate count reference method was reported for some analyses in certain food matrices (Cirolini et al 2013).…”
Section: Conventional Methods For the Assessment Of Microbiological F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite delivering high-throughput analysis (100 enumerations/hour), sensitivity may not be suitable for all kinds of microbiological analysis (detection range: 10 2 -10 8 CFU/g) (BioMérieux 2018). Such an instrument ensures considerable time and labor saving, performing well in food analysis in comparison with standard methods (Owen, Willis, and Lamph 2010;Paulsen et al 2008), but poor accuracy compared to plate count reference method was reported for some analyses in certain food matrices (Cirolini et al 2013).…”
Section: Conventional Methods For the Assessment Of Microbiological F...mentioning
confidence: 99%