2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-20612009000100019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and validation of a methodology to determine total arsenic, As(III) and As(V), in water samples, through graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples were digested by dry ashing in porcelain containers by adding 10 ml of concentrated HNO 3 and 5 ml Mg(NO 3 ) 2 (9% solution, w/v) . The mixture was first maintained over a hot plate until dryness and then in muffle furnace at 450 C for 12 h. The residue was dissolved in 0.5 ml of HNO 3 (10% solution, v/v) and transferred to a 14 ml volumetric polypropylene tube and completed with deionized water (Santos & Jacob, 2009). …”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were digested by dry ashing in porcelain containers by adding 10 ml of concentrated HNO 3 and 5 ml Mg(NO 3 ) 2 (9% solution, w/v) . The mixture was first maintained over a hot plate until dryness and then in muffle furnace at 450 C for 12 h. The residue was dissolved in 0.5 ml of HNO 3 (10% solution, v/v) and transferred to a 14 ml volumetric polypropylene tube and completed with deionized water (Santos & Jacob, 2009). …”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%